Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise.

Rhea Diamond, Susan E. Carey·1986·Journal of Experimental Psychology General

Abstract

Recognition memory for faces is hampered much more by inverted presentation than is memory for any other material so far examined. The present study demonstrates that faces are not unique with regard to this vulnerability to inversion. The experiments also attempt to isolate the source of the inversion effect. In one experiment, use of stimuli (landscapes) in which spatial relations among elements are potentially important distinguishing features is shown not to guarantee a large inversion effect. Two additional experiments show that for dog experts sufficiently knowledgeable to individuate dogs of the same breed, memory for photographs of dogs of that breed is as disrupted by inversion as is face recognition. A final experiment indicates that the effect of orientation on memory for faces does not depend on inability to identify single features of these stimuli upside down. These experiments are consistent with the view that experts represent items in memory in terms of distinguishing features of a different kind than do novices. Speculations as to the type of feature used and neuropsychological and developmental implications of this accomplishment are offered.

Cites (2)

  1. Looking at upside-down faces.
    Yin, Robert K. · 1969 · Journal of Experimental Psychology
  2. Development of face recognition: A maturational component?
    Carey, Susan, Diamond, Rhea, Woods, Bryan · 1980 · Developmental Psychology

Show all 2 references

Cited by (59)

  1. Visual fixation patterns during viewing of naturalistic social situations as predictors of social competence in individuals with autism
    Klin, Ami, Jones, Warren, Schultz, Robert, Volkmar, Fred, Cohen, Donald · 2002 · Archives of General Psychiatry
  2. The many faces of configural processing
    Maurer, Daphne, Grand, Richard Le, Mondloch, Catherine J. · 2002 · Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  3. The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces
    Kanwisher, Nancy, Yovel, Galit · 2006 · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
  4. Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition
    Gauthier, Isabel, Skudlarski, Pawel, Gore, John C., Anderson, Adam W. · 2000 · Nature Neuroscience
  5. Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: a meta-analytic review
    Meissner, Christian A., Brigham, John C. · 2001 · Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

See all 1,584

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0096-3445.115.2.107
The paper
Diamond, R., & Carey, S. E. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.115.2.107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.