Cited by 2,624Face Recognition and PerceptionMemory Processes and InfluencesFace recognition and analysis

Looking at upside-down faces.

Yin, Robert K.·1969·Journal of Experimental Psychology

Abstract

Compared memory for faces with memory for other classes of familar and complex objects which, like faces, are also customarily seen only in 1 orientation (mono-oriented). Performance of 4 students was tested when the inspection and test series were presented in the same orientation, either both upri

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0027474

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yin, R. K.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Yin, Robert K.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology
Published
1969-07
Volume
81
Issue
1
Pages
141-145
ISSN
0022-1015 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983006628
Cited by
2,624
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 64 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 93 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 95 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 85 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 101 · 2015: 105 · 2014: 125 · 2013: 131 · 2012: 122
FWCI
5.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
Keywords
face recognition (cognition), face memory, inverted faces, orientation, visual perception, object recognition, familiarity, recognition memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review