Conditioned fear and startle magnitude: Effects of different footshock or backshock intensities used in training.

Abstract

In Experiment 1 four groups of rats received 30 light-shock pairings using footshock intensities of either .2, .4, .8, or 1.6 mA. One day later all rats were tested for startle by presenting tones in the presence or absence of the light CS. Potentiated startle (the difference between startle on light-tone vs tone-alone trials) was nonmonotonically related to the shock intensity used in training, with the greatest potentiation at intermediate shock levels. Experiment 3 demonstrated a similar relationship when backshocks instead of footshocks were used. In Experiment 2 rats were trained with either a moderate or high shock and then given an extended extinction-test session 1 day later. The moderate-shock group showed a gradual decline in potentiated startle over extinction. The high-shock group showed a nonmonotonic extinction curve where potentiation progressively increased toward the middle of extinction and dissipated thereafter. The results suggest that acoustic startle bears an inverted U-shaped relationship to fear and are discussed in relation to other studies concerned with this issue.

Cites (1)

1. Conditioned fear as revealed by magnitude of startle response to an auditory stimulus.
   Brown, Judson S., Kalish, Harry I., Farber, I. E. · 1951 · Journal of Experimental Psychology

Show all 1 references

Cited by (32)

1. Emotion, attention, and the startle reflex
   Lang, Peter J., Bradley, Margaret M., Cuthbert, Bruce N. · 1990 · Psychological Review
2. Fear Extinction as a Model for Translational Neuroscience: Ten Years of Progress
   Milad, Mohammed R., Quirk, Gregory J. · 2012 · Annual Review of Psychology
3. Fear and anxiety: Animal models and human cognitive psychophysiology
   Lang, Peter J, Davis, Michael, Öhman, Arne · 2000 · Journal of Affective Disorders
4. Don’t fear “fear conditioning”: Methodological considerations for the design and analysis of studies on human fear acquisition, extinction, and return of fear
   Lonsdorf, Tina B., Menz, Mareike M., Andreatta, Marta, Fullana, Miguel A., Golkar, Armita, Haaker, Jan, Heitland, Ivo, Hermann, Andrea, Kuhn, Manuel, Kruse, Onno et al. · 2017 · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
5. Reflex modification in the domain of startle: I. Some empirical findings and their implications for how the nervous system processes sensory input.
   Hoffman, Howard S., Ison, James R. · 1980 · Psychological Review

See all 301