The relative efficacy of avoidant and nonavoidant coping strategies: A meta-analysis.

Jerry M. Suls, Barbara Fletcher·1985·Health Psychology

Abstract

A casual review of the research literature on coping strategies suggests that strategies involving avoidant tactics are effective in reducing pain, stress, and anxiety in some cases, whereas nonavoidant strategies (called here attention), appear to be more effective in others. This article reports the results of a series of meta-analyses to ascertain whether there are systematic patterns in the empirical literature that describe when attention strategies are more or less effective than avoidant strategies. In particular, we consider the role of different kinds of attentional sets and also the role of time--whether some kinds of strategies work best in the early phases of the stress experience, and others are more efficacious in later phases of the stress experience. Results of an overall analysis of studies providing tests of attention versus avoidance indicated little evidence for one strategy's superiority. However, supplementary analyses, motivated by theoretical reasons, suggest there are boundary conditions that define the relative efficacy of a specific strategy. Overall, avoidance was associated with more positive adaptation in the short-run. However, attention was superior to avoidance if the former involved a focus on sensory schemata rather than emotional processing. If attention involved an emotional interpretational set or no explicit set, then it was associated with more negative outcomes than avoidance. In terms of long-term outcomes, avoidance indicates better outcomes initially, but with time, attention was associated with more positive outcomes. A final set of analyses found that both attention and avoidance facilitate adaptation as compared with no instruction controls. The meta-analyses suggest the important role of interpretational set and whether one looks at the immediate or at the long-term effects of coping. Limitations of the analyses and directions for future research are discussed.

Cites (8)

  1. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
    Campbell, Donald T., Fiske, Donald W. · 1959 · Psychological Bulletin
  2. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
    Rosenthal, Robert · 1979 · Psychological Bulletin
  3. Hardiness and health: A prospective study.
    Kobasa, Suzanne C., Maddi, Salvatore R., Kahn, Stephen · 1982 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  4. The stability of behavior: I. On predicting most of the people much of the time.
    Epstein, Seymour · 1979 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  5. Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis.
    Greenwald, Anthony G. · 1975 · Psychological Bulletin
  6. The effectiveness of attention and rejection as coping styles: A meta-analysis of temporal differences
    Mullen, Brian, Suls, Jerry · 1982 · Journal of Psychosomatic Research
  7. Stress reduction in young dental patients through coping skills and sensory information.
    Siegel, Lawrence J., Peterson, Lizette · 1980 · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  8. Coping with Impending Stress: Psychophysiological and Cognitive Correlates of Choice
    Miller, Suzanne M. · 1979 · Psychophysiology

Show all 8 references

Cited by (72)

  1. Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach.
    Carver, Charles S., Scheier, Michael F., Weintraub, Jagdish K. · 1989 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  2. Mindfulness: Theoretical Foundations and Evidence for its Salutary Effects
    Brown, Kirk Warren, Ryan, Richard M., Creswell, J. David · 2007 · Psychological Inquiry
  3. Effects of optimism on psychological and physical well-being: theoretical overview and empirical update
    Scheier, Michael F., Carver, Charles S. · 1992 · Cognitive Therapy and Research
  4. Understanding the links between social support and physical health: A life-span perspective with emphasis on the separability of perceived and received support
    Uchino, Bert N. · 2009 · Perspectives on Psychological Science
  5. Modeling cognitive adaptation: A longitudinal investigation of the impact of individual differences and coping on college adjustment and performance.
    Aspinwall, Lisa G., Taylor, Shelley E. · 1992 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

See all 1,225

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The relative efficacy of avoidant and nonavoidant coping strategies: A meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0278-6133.4.3.249
The paper
Suls, J. M., & Fletcher, B. (1985). The relative efficacy of avoidant and nonavoidant coping strategies: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-6133.4.3.249

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.