Category differentiation in object recognition: Typicality constraints on the basic category advantage.
Abstract
When people are asked to decide whether an object is in a given category, they generally respond faster when the category is at the basic level (e.g., car) than when it is at the superordinate level (e.g., vehicle) or the subordinate level (e.g., sedan). Basic categories have shorter and more frequent names, are learned earlier, and are usually more highly differentiated than other categories (they are both specific and distinctive), but it is not clear which of these factors is responsible for the faster response to basic categories. In three experiments with natural language categories, we found evidence that objects can be identified fastest as members of differentiated categories, even when such categories have longer names and are learned later than less differentiated categories. Specifically, we argued that atypical subordinate categories (e.g., racing car) are highly differentiated and should therefore be responded to as fast as basic categories in object recognition. The results supported this view and also ruled out the hypothesis that objects are necessarily identified as members of basic categories before further identification. We discuss the implications of these findings for the use of category names as definite descriptions in discourse.
Cites (2)
- Logic and ConversationGrice, H. P. · 1975 · Speech Acts
- Basic objects in natural categoriesRosch, Eleanor, Mervis, Carolyn B, Gray, Wayne D, Johnson, David M, Boyes-Braem, Penny · 1976 · Cognitive Psychology
Cited by (4)
- Dimensions of Consumer ExpertiseAlba, Joseph W., Hutchinson, J. Wesley · 1987 · Journal of Consumer Research
- Effects of varying levels of expertise on the basic level of categorization.Johnson, Kathy E., Mervis, Carolyn B. · 1997 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
- Person Categorization and StereotypingZarate, Michael A., Smith, Eliot R. · 1990 · Social Cognition
- A mathematical theory of semantic development in deep neural networksSaxe, Andrew M., McClelland, James L., Ganguli, Surya · 2019 · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Category differentiation in object recognition: Typicality constraints on the basic category advantage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0278-7393.11.1.70
- The paper
- Murphy, G. L., & Brownell, H. H. (1985). Category differentiation in object recognition: Typicality constraints on the basic category advantage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.11.1.70
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.