Effects of familiarity and aptness on metaphor processing.

Dawn G. Blasko, Cynthia M. Connine·1993·Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition

Abstract

A cross-modal priming paradigm was used to examine the comprehension of metaphors varying in familiarity and aptness. In Experiments 1 and 2 high-familiar metaphors showed availability of the figurative meaning, but low-familiar (LF) metaphors did not. In Experiment 3, only LF metaphors that had been rated highly apt showed evidence of figurative activation. Experiment 4 showed evidence of figurative activation for most LF and moderate-apt metaphors. The locus of activation was investigated in Experiment 5 in which the individual words of the metaphor (topic and vehicle) served as primes. Neither topic nor vehicle showed evidence of priming the metaphor target, suggesting that activation of the metaphorical target in Experiments 1-4 was not caused by lexical activation of the words within the metaphors, but rather was due to activation of emergent properties of the metaphorical phrase.

Cites (28)

  1. Metaphors We Live By
    Lakoff, George, Johnson, Mark · 2003 · University of Chicago Press eBooks
  2. FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR
    W. Nelson Francis, Henry Kučera, Andrew W. Mackie · 1983 · Medical Entomology and Zoology
  3. Metaphor and Thought
    Andrew Ortony · 1979
  4. Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects
    Swinney, David A. · 1979 · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
  5. Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech
    Marslen-Wilson, William D, Welsh, Alan · 1978 · Cognitive Psychology
  6. Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity.
    Sam Glucksberg, Boaz Keysar · 1990 · Psychological Review
  7. Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy
    GENTNER, D · 1983 · Cognitive Science
  8. Beyond literal similarity.
    Ortony, Andrew · 1979 · Psychological Review
  9. Interpreting metaphors and idioms: Some effects of context on comprehension
    Ortony, Andrew, Schallert, Diane L., Reynolds, Ralph E., Antos, Stephen J. · 1978 · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
  10. The comprehension of idioms
    Cacciari, Cristina, Tabossi, Patrizia · 1988 · Journal of Memory and Language

Show all 28 references

Cited by (3)

  1. A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated
    Gibbs Jr., Raymond W. · 2002 · Journal of Pragmatics
  2. Repetition suppression for spoken sentences and the effect of task demands
    Hasson, Uri, Nusbaum, Howard C., Small, Steven L. · 2006 · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
  3. Only the tip of the iceberg: Who understands what about metaphor?
    Blasko, Dawn G. · 1999 · Journal of Pragmatics

See all 411

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of familiarity and aptness on metaphor processing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0278-7393.19.2.295
The paper
Blasko, D. G., & Connine, C. M. (1993). Effects of familiarity and aptness on metaphor processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.19.2.295

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.