Reliability of prosodic cues for resolving syntactic ambiguity.

Allbritton, David W., McKoon, Gail, Ratcliff, Roger·1996·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

Abstract

Although previous research has shown that listeners can use prosody to resolve syntactic ambiguities in spoken sentences, it is not clear whether naive, untrained speakers in experimental situations ordinarily produce the prosodic cues necessary for disambiguating such sentences. In a series of experiments, the authors found that neither professional nor untrained speakers consistently produced such prosodic cues when simply reading ambiguous sentences in a disambiguating discourse context. Speakers who were aware of the ambiguities and were told to intentionally pronounce the sentences with one meaning of the other, however, did produce sufficient prosodic cues for listeners to identify the intended meanings.

Cited by (5)

  1. Aligning Theory and Assessment of Reading Fluency: Automaticity, Prosody, and Definitions of Fluency
    Kuhn, Melanie R., Schwanenflugel, Paula J., Meisinger, Elizabeth B. · 2010 · Reading Research Quarterly
  2. The communicative function of ambiguity in language
    Piantadosi, Steven T., Tily, Harry, Gibson, Edward · 2012 · Cognition
  3. Prosodic phrasing is central to language comprehension
    FRAZIER, L, CARLSON, K, CLIFTONJR, C · 2006 · Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  4. Egocentrism over e-mail: can we communicate as well as we think?
    Kruger, Justin, Epley, Nicholas, Parker, Jason, Ng, Zhi-Wen · 2005 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  5. Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review
    Wagner, Michael, Watson, Duane G. · 2010 · Language and Cognitive Processes

See all 159

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reliability of prosodic cues for resolving syntactic ambiguity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0278-7393.22.3.714
The paper
Allbritton, D. W., McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1996). Reliability of prosodic cues for resolving syntactic ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.22.3.714

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.