The DOI matches its Crossref record; 130 of the 130 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review
Open accessAbstract
Research on prosody has recently become an important focus in various disciplines, including Linguistics, Psychology, and Computer Science. This article reviews recent research advances on two key issues: prosodic phrasing and prosodic prominence. Both aspects of prosody are influenced by linguistic factors such as syntactic constituent structure, semantic relations, phonological rhythm, pragmatic considerations, and also by processing factors such as the length, complexity or predictability of linguistic material. Our review summarizes recent insights into the production and perception of these two components of prosody and their grammatical underpinnings. While this review only covers a subset of a broader set of research topics on prosody in cognitive science, they are representative of a tendency in the field toward a more interdisciplinary approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968) · Cited by 5,162
Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar
Freidin, R., & Jackendoff, R. S. (1975) · Language · doi:10.2307/413161 · Cited by 4,615
Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure
Selkirk, E. O. (1984) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,374
A theory of focus interpretation
Rooth, M. (1992) · Natural Language Semantics · doi:10.1007/bf02342617 · Cited by 3,194
Integration of Visual and Linguistic Information in Spoken Language Comprehension
Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7777863 · Cited by 2,929
Ladd, D. R. (1996) · Cited by 2,742
Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse
Grosz, B. J., & Sidner, C. L. (1986) · doi:10.5555/12457.12458 · Cited by 2,580
The phonology and phonetics of English intonation
Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1987) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 2,378
Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2
Halliday, M. A. K. (1967) · Journal of Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0022226700016613 · Cited by 2,090
Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse
Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R. (1993) · Language · doi:10.2307/416535 · Cited by 2,000
Cited by
The architecture of grammar and the division of labor in exponence
Bermúdez-Otero, R. (2012) · The Morphology and Phonology of Exponence · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573721.003.0002 · Cited by 269
A survey on neural speech synthesis
Tan, X., Qin, T., Soong, F., & Liu, T.-Y. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.15561 · Cited by 216
Lindström, R., Lepistö-Paisley, T., Makkonen, T., Reinvall, O., Nieminen-von Wendt, T., Alén, R., & Kujala, T. (2018) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2018.08.018 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Wagner, M., & Watson, D. G.
- Venue
- Language and Cognitive Processes
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-05-26
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 7-9
- Pages
- 905-945
- ISSN
- 0169-0965 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0732
- OpenAlex
- W2069859485
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 130
- FWCI
- 18.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01690961003589492
- The paper
- Wagner, M., & Watson, D. G. (2010). Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690961003589492
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
