The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings and familiarity.

Whittlesea, Bruce W. A., Williams, Lisa D.·2001·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

Abstract

B. W. A. Whittlesea and L. D. Williams (1998, 2000) proposed the discrepancy-attribution hypothesis to explain the source of feelings of familiarity. By that hypothesis, people chronically evaluate the coherence of their processing. When the quality of processing is perceived as being discrepant from that which could be expected, people engage in an attributional process; the feeling of familiarity occurs when perceived discrepancy is attributed to prior experience. In the present article, the authors provide convergent evidence for that hypothesis and show that it can also explain feelings of familiarity for nonlinguistic stimuli. They demonstrate that the perception of discrepancy is not automatic but instead depends critically on the attitude that people adopt toward their processing, given the task and context. The connection between the discrepancy-attribution hypothesis and the "revelation effect" is also explored (e.g., D. L. Westerman & R. L. Greene, 1996).

Cites (4)

  1. Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability
    Tversky, Amos, Kahneman, Daniel · 1973 · Cognitive Psychology
  2. Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state.
    Schachter, Stanley, Singer, Jerome · 1962 · Psychological Review
  3. On the psychology of prediction.
    Kahneman, Daniel, Tversky, Amos · 1973 · Psychological Review
  4. Belief in the law of small numbers.
    Tversky, Amos, Kahneman, Daniel · 1971 · Psychological Bulletin

Show all 4 references

Cited by (5)

  1. The truth about the truth: a meta-analytic review of the truth effect
    Dechêne, Alice, Stahl, Christoph, Hansen, Jochim, Wänke, Michaela · 2010 · Personality and Social Psychology Review
  2. How hypnosis happens: new cognitive theories of hypnotic responding
    Barnier, Amanda J., Dienes, Zoltan, Mitchell, Chris J. · 2008 · Oxford Handbooks Online
  3. Uninformative photos can increase people's perceived knowledge of complicated processes.
    Cardwell, Brittany A., Lindsay, D. Stephen, Förster, Katharina, Garry, Maryanne · 2017 · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
  4. Nonprobative photos rapidly lead people to believe claims about their own (and other people’s) pasts
    Cardwell, Brittany A., Henkel, Linda A., Garry, Maryanne, Newman, Eryn J., Foster, Jeffrey L. · 2016 · Memory & Cognition
  5. When the sense of fluency triggers an attentional bias
    Turo, Sibylle, Collin, Frédéric, Brouillet, Denis · 2023 · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

See all 323

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings and familiarity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0278-7393.27.1.3
The paper
Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (2001). The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings and familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.27.1.3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.