Memory interference during language processing.
Abstract
The authors studied the operation of working memory in language comprehension by examining the reading of complex sentences. Reading time and comprehension accuracy in self-paced reading by college students were studied as a function of type of embedded clause (object-extracted vs. subject-extracted) and the types of noun phrases (NPs) in the stimulus sentences, including relative clauses and clefts. The poorer language comprehension performance typically observed for object-extracted compared with subject-extracted forms was found to depend strongly on the mixture of types of NPs (descriptions, indexical pronouns, and names) in a sentence. Having two NPs of the same type led to a larger performance difference than having two NPs of a different type. The findings support a conception of working memory in which similarity-based interference plays an important role in sentence complexity effects.
Cites (5)
- A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memoryJust, Marcel A., Carpenter, Patricia A. · 1992 · Psychological Review
- Long-term working memory.Ericsson, K. Anders, Kintsch, Walter · 1995 · Psychological Review
- Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependenciesGibson, Edward · 1998 · Cognition
- The phonological loop as a language learning device.Baddeley, Alan, Gathercole, Susan, Papagno, Costanza · 1998 · Psychological Review
- Effects of syntactic structure and propositional number on patterns of regional cerebral blood flowCaplan, David, Alpert, Nathaniel, Waters, Gloria · 1998 · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Cited by (10)
- Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehensionLewis, Richard L., Vasishth, Shravan, Van Dyke, Julie A. · 2006 · Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information densityFlorian Jaeger, T. · 2010 · Cognitive Psychology
- Reworking the language networkFedorenko, Evelina, Thompson-Schill, Sharon L. · 2014 · Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Consequences of the Serial Nature of Linguistic Input for Sentenial ComplexityGrodner, Daniel, Gibson, Edward · 2005 · Cognitive Science
- Frequency of basic English grammatical structures: A corpus analysisRoland, Douglas, Dick, Frederic, Elman, Jeffrey L. · 2007 · Journal of Memory and Language
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Memory interference during language processing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0278-7393.27.6.1411
- The paper
- Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Johnson, M. (2001). Memory interference during language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.27.6.1411
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.