Remembered duration: Evidence for a contextual-change hypothesis.
Abstract
Two experiments used levels-of-processing tasks to investigate hypotheses on remembered duration of relatively long intervals. In Experiment 1, level of processing (shallow or deep) of presented information did not affect remembered duration, even though it had a substantial effect on memory for individual stimulus events. In Experiment 2, an interval containing different kinds of tasks (both shallow and deep processing) was remembered as being longer than one containing a single kind of task (either shallow or deep processing). Current formulations of event-memory, attentional, and informational hypotheses on remembered duration cannot easily explain these findings. However, the findings are consistent with a contextual-change hypothesis, which emphasizes memory for the overall amount of change in cognitive context during an interval. Implications regarding contextual factors in memory are discussed.
Cites (2)
- Levels of processing: A framework for memory researchCraik, Fergus I.M., Lockhart, Robert S. · 1972 · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
- Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall.Anderson, John R., Bower, Gordon H. · 1972 · Psychological Review
Cited by (3)
- Dynamic attending and responses to time.Mari Riess Jones, Marilyn G. Boltz · 1989 · Psychological Review
- Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: A meta-analytic reviewBlock, Richard A., Zakay, Dan · 1997 · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
- The perception and cognition of environmental distance: Direct sources of informationMontello, Daniel R. · 1997 · Lecture Notes in Computer Science
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Remembered duration: Evidence for a contextual-change hypothesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0278-7393.4.6.656
- The paper
- Block, R. A., & Reed, M. A. (1978). Remembered duration: Evidence for a contextual-change hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.4.6.656
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.