Cited by 9,566Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

Levels of processing: A framework for memory research

Craik, Fergus I.M., Lockhart, Robert S.·1972·Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-5371(72)80001-x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LOP theory posits that memory for an item depends on the level or relative depth at which the item is processed in a learner's cognitive system.

    “Such findings are in line with the levels of processing (LOP) theory of human memory (Craik and Lockhart, 1972), which posits that memory for an item depends on the level or relative depth at which the item is processed in a learner's cognitive system.”

    From Effects of sentence writing in second language lexical acquisition (2004) · cites this paper as Craik and Lockhart, 1972

  • Interactive tasks in games can promote deeper levels of processing, increasing the retention of vocabulary knowledge.

    “Third, interactive tasks in games can promote deeper levels of processing, increasing the retention of vocabulary knowledge (Craik and Lockhart, 1972; Hulstijn and Laufer, 2001; Keating, 2008; Laufer and Hulstijn, 2001).”
  • The strength of a memory is a positive function of the depth to which the stimulus is analyzed.

    “They postulated that the strength of a memory is a positive function of the depth to which the stimulus is analyzed.”

    From Supporting Novice to Expert Transitions in User Interfaces (2015) · cites this paper as Craik and Lockhart 1972

  • Deeper mental encodings result in stronger memories.

    “In seeking to exploit findings from psychology suggesting that”

    From Supporting Novice to Expert Transitions in User Interfaces (2015) · cites this paper as Craik and Lockhart 1972

  • Released resources from externalisations could serve a deeper elaboration of processed information, which in turn could cause stronger memory representations.

    “One might consider that such released resources which come along with externalisations (Kirsh, 2010) could serve a deeper elaboration of the processed information (Sweller et al., 1998). In return, such a deeper elaboration could cause stronger memory representations (Craik & Lockhart, 1972).”

    From Consequences of cognitive offloading: Boosting performance but diminishing memory (2021) · cites this paper as Craik & Lockhart, 1972

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1972-12
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
671-684
ISSN
0022-5371 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990451873
Cited by
9,566
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 233 · 2025: 286 · 2024: 277 · 2023: 258 · 2022: 282 · 2021: 291 · 2020: 322 · 2019: 318 · 2018: 303 · 2017: 307 · 2016: 260 · 2015: 337 · 2014: 327 · 2013: 304 · 2012: 319
FWCI
44.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
levels of processing, human memory, verbal learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review