Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for training of researchers.

Frank L. Schmidt·1996·Psychological Methods
DOI 10.1037//1082-989x.1.2.115

Cited by (80)

  1. Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists
    Nakagawa, Shinichi, Cuthill, Innes C. · 2007 · Biological Reviews
  2. Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations
    Greenland, Sander, Senn, Stephen J., Rothman, Kenneth J., Carlin, John B., Poole, Charles, Goodman, Steven N., Altman, Douglas G. · 2016 · European Journal of Epidemiology
  3. Neurocognitive deficit in schizophrenia: A quantitative review of the evidence.
    Heinrichs, R. Walter, Zakzanis, Konstantine K. · 1998 · Neuropsychology
  4. Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations.
    Wilkinson, Leland, Task Force on Statistical Inference · 1999 · American Psychologist
  5. A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values
    Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan · 2007 · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

See all 783

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for training of researchers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//1082-989x.1.2.115
The paper
Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for training of researchers. Psychological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989x.1.2.115

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.