Cited by 2,791Psychology Research and BibliometricsMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations.

Wilkinson, Leland, Task Force on Statistical Inference·1999·American Psychologist

Abstract

In the light of continuing debate over the applications of significance testing in psychology journals and following the publication of Cohen (1994), the Board of Scientific Affairs (BSA) of the APA convened a committee called the Task Force on Statistical Inference (TFSI) whose charge was “to elucidate some of the controversial issues surrounding applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0003-066x.54.8.594

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Replication is the most objective method for checking if the result of a study is reliable and plays an essential role in the advance of scientific knowledge.

    “Several authors have pointed out that replication is the most objective method for checking if the result of a study is reliable and this concept plays an essential role in the advance of scientific knowledge (Carver, 1978; Wilkinson and The Task Force on Statistical, Inference, 1999; Nickerson, 2000; Hubbard, 2004; Cumming, 2008; Hubbard and Lindsay, 2008; Asendorpt et al., 2013; Kline, 2013; St”

    From Misconceptions of the p-value among Chilean and Italian Academic Psychologists (2016) · cites this paper as Wilkinson and The Task Force on Statistical, Inference, 1999

  • Reporting the effect size and its confidence intervals (CIs) could help avoid these erroneous interpretations.

    “Reporting the effect size and its confidence intervals (CIs) could help avoid these erroneous interpretations (Kirk, 1996; Wilkinson and The Task Force on Statistical, Inference, 1999; Gliner et al., 2001; Balluerka et al., 2009; Fidler and Loftus, 2009; American Psychological Association, 2010; Coulson et al., 2010; Monterde-i-Bort et al., 2010; Hoekstra et al., 2012).”

    From Misconceptions of the p-value among Chilean and Italian Academic Psychologists (2016) · cites this paper as Wilkinson and The Task Force on Statistical Inference (1999)

  • Planned contrasts are recommended as a means to test the hypotheses in intervention studies.

    “Furthermore, we calculated planned contrasts, which are recommended as a means to test the hypotheses in intervention studies (Wilkinson & the Task Force on Statistical Inference 1999).”

    From Transfer of metacognitive skills in self-regulated learning: an experimental training study (2020) · cites this paper as Wilkinson & the Task Force on Statistical Inference 1999

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilkinson, L., & Task Force on Statistical Inference
Corresponding author
Wilkinson, Leland
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
1999-08
Volume
54
Issue
8
Pages
594-604
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W2104818169
Cited by
2,791
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 93 · 2021: 145 · 2020: 112 · 2019: 109 · 2018: 121 · 2017: 126 · 2016: 119 · 2015: 126 · 2014: 141 · 2013: 133 · 2012: 128
FWCI
125.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Keywords
statistical inference, significance testing, statistical reporting guidelines, reporting guidelines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review