Cited by 111Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Mentalization-based treatment for children: A time-limited approach.

Midgley, Nick, Ensink, Karin, Lindqvist, Karin, Malberg, Norka, Muller, Nicole·2017·American Psychological Association eBooks

Abstract

This is the first comprehensive clinical introduction to using a time-limited mentalizing approach for working with children, ages 5 to 12, who experience emotional and behavioral problems, including anxiety, depression, and relational difficulties. \n \nMentalization-based treatment (MBT) promotes a child's ability to make sense of their own mind, and the minds of others around them. \n \nThe authors, an international team of clinician–researchers who are pioneering the MBT model with children, explore the significance of mentalization and describe in detail the process of conducting short-term (9–12 sessions) MBT for children, including problem assessment and case formulation in terms of mentalizing techniques, the therapist's stance, and treatment termination. \n \nThe approach draws on traditional psychodynamic principles but integrates them with findings from attachment theory, the empirical study of mentalization, and features of other evidence-based approaches. \n \nThis book includes a chapter-length case illustration and an appendix that lists measures of reflective functioning in children and their parents as well as validation articles.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0000028-000

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When problematic relationships in the context of COVID-19 fears call for clinical intervention, improving the capacity to represent and mentalize the internal states and interpersonal motivations of significant others may be critical for both adults and children.

    “When problematic relationships in the context of the fears of COVID-19 call for a clinical intervention, improving the capacity to represent and mentalize the internal states and the interpersonal motivations of the significant others may be critical for both adults (Allen & Fonagy, 2006) and children (Midgley, Ensink, Linqvist, Malberg, & Muller, 2017).”

    From The four horsemen of fear: An integrated model of understanding fear experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020) · cites this paper as Midgley, Ensink, Linqvist, Malberg, & Muller, 2017

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Midgley, N., Ensink, K., Lindqvist, K., Malberg, N., & Muller, N.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Université Laval (CA)
  • Yale University (US)
Venue
American Psychological Association eBooks
Published
2017
OpenAlex
W2606457446
Cited by
111
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
11.20
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
mentalization-based treatment, children, time-limited therapy, mentalization, reflective functioning, emotional and behavioral problems, anxiety, depression, relationship problems, attachment theory, psychodynamic psychotherapy, therapist stance, treatment discontinuation, case formulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review