Cited by 115Psychology Research and BibliometricsDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How often are our numbers wrong?

Rosenthal, Robert·1978·American Psychologist

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0003-066x.33.11.1005

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rosenthal, R.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Rosenthal, Robert
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
1978-11
Volume
33
Issue
11
Pages
1005-1008
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W2031227039
Cited by
115
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
19.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
measurement error, reliability statistics, measurement accuracy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review