Cited by 15Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisPolicing Practices and PerceptionsSocial and Intergroup Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Blinding prosecutors to defendants’ race: A policy proposal to reduce unconscious bias in the criminal justice system

Open access
Sah, Sunita, Robertson, Christopher T., Baughman, Shima B.·2015·Behavioral Science & Policy

Abstract

Racial minorities are disproportionately imprisoned in the United States. This disparity is unlikely to be due solely to differences in criminal behavior. Behavioral science research has documented that prosecutors harbor unconscious racial biases. These unconscious biases play a role whenever prosecutors exercise their broad discretion, such as in choosing what crimes to charge and when negotiating plea bargains. To reduce this risk of unconscious racial bias, we propose a policy change: Prosecutors should be blinded to the race of criminal defendants wherever feasible. This could be accomplished by removing information identifying or suggesting the defendant's race from police dossiers shared with prosecutors and by avoiding mentions of race in conversations between prosecutors and defense attorneys. Race is almost always irrelevant to the merits of a criminal prosecution; it should be omitted from the proceedings whenever possible for the sake of justice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/237946151500100208

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. Bibas S., 2009, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 157, 959
  2. Bibas S., 2006, New York University Law Review, 86, 911
  3. 10.1111/j.1467-9930.2006.00236.x · DOI
  4. 10.2307/1227884 · DOI
  5. Leonetti C., 2012, Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, 22, 53
  6. Guerino P., 2011, Prisoners in 2010
  7. Glaze L. E., 2011, Correctional populations in the United States, 2010
  8. Fagan J., 2008, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 173
  9. Sommers S. R., 2014, Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 103
  10. 10.1007/s10940-005-7362-7 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Tonry M., 2011, Punishing race: A continuing American dilemma
  12. Burke A. S., 2006, William & Mary Law Review, 47, 1587
  13. Smith A., 2001, Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, 14, 355
  14. Kutateladze B., 2012, Do race and ethnicity matter in prosecution? A review of empirical studies
  15. Johnson J. L., 2014, Mass incarceration on trial: A remarkable court decision and the future of prisons in America
  16. Henning K. N., 2013, Cornell Law Review, 98, 383
  17. Levinson J. D., 2010, West Virginia Law Review, 112, 307
  18. 10.1002/ejsp.450 · DOI
  19. Hartney C., 2007, And justice for some: Differential treatment of youth of color in the justice system
  20. 10.1371/journal.pone.0036680 · DOI
  21. Sah S., 2013, Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 41, 665
  22. 10.1177/0007650313496366 · DOI
  23. Johnson S. L., 1988, Cornell Law Review, 73, 1016
  24. Lawrence C. R., 1987, Stanford Law Review, 38, 317
  25. Sah S., 2015, I am immune: A sense of invulnerability predicts increased acceptance of, and influence from, conflicts of interest
  26. 10.1001/jama.2010.1310 · DOI
  27. 10.3758/PBR.17.2.161 · DOI
  28. 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00680.x · DOI
  29. Levinson J. D., 2007, Duke Law Journal, 57, 345
  30. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02804.x · DOI
  31. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01716.x · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1016/j.soscij.2010.08.003 · DOI
  33. 10.1177/0956797614541989 · DOI
  34. 10.1177/0146167202286008 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.781 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Davis A. J., 2013, New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, 16, 821
  37. 10.1177/0956797613511824 · DOI
  38. 10.1177/0146167204264244 · DOI
  39. 10.1257/aer.90.4.715 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07816-9 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1136/bmj.39465.451748.AD · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1001/jama.2010.1161 · DOI
  43. Carrington P. D., 1992, Florida Law Review, 44, 501
  44. 10.1037/h0093921 · DOI
  45. Garrett B. L., 2014, Virginia Journal of Criminal Law, 2, 2013
  46. Wells G. L., 1988, Eyewitness identification: A system handbook
  47. National Research Council. (2014). Identifying the culprit: Assessing eyewitness identification. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  48. 10.1177/0956797611434539 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1177/1948550611422958 · DOI
  50. Jensen R., 2005, The heart of Whiteness: Confronting race, racism and White privilege
  51. 10.1177/0146167207303016 · DOI
  52. McIntosh P., 1998, Race, class, and gender in the United States: An integrated study, 165
  53. 10.1001/jama.2012.154 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.06.005 · DOI
  55. 10.1037/a0030527 · DOI
  56. 10.1257/0002828042002561 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Kutateladze B. L., 2014, Prosecution and racial justice in New York County—Technical report
  58. Gershowitz A. M., 2011, Northwestern University Law Review, 105, 262
  59. Perry S., 2011, Prosecutors in state courts—2007 statistical tables
  60. Rosenmerkel S., 2009, Felony sentences in state courts, 2006—Statistical tables
  61. Schmitt J., 2010, The high budgetary cost of incarceration
  62. Western B., 2010, Collateral costs: Incarceration's effect on economic mobility
  63. Tyler T. R., 1990, Why people obey the law: Procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 15

Metadata

Authors
Sah, S., Robertson, C. T., & Baughman, S. B.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Sah, Sunita
Venue
Behavioral Science & Policy
Published
2015-10
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
69-76
ISSN
  • 2379-4607 (ISSN-L)
  • 2379-4615
OpenAlex
W2175975237
Cited by
15
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioral Science & Policy (publishedVersion)
  • eYLS (Yale Law School) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • eYLS (Yale Law School) (submittedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
public prosecutor, criminal defendants, plea bargaining, charging decisions, racial disparities in incarceration, defense counsel, criminal justice reform, prosecutorial discretion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review