The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Test validity and the ethics of assessment.
Abstract
Questions of the adequacy of a test as a measure of the characteristic it is interpreted to assess are answerable on scientific grounds by appraising psychometric evidence, especially construct validity. Questions of the appropriateness of test use in proposed applications are answerable on qthical grounds by appraising potential social consequences of the testing. The first set of answers provides an evidential basis for test interpretation, and the second set provides a consequential basis for test use. In addition, this article stresses (a) the importance of construct validity for test use because it provides a rational foundation for predictiveness and relevance, and (b) the importance of taking into account the value implications of test interpretations per se. By thus considering both the evidential and consequential bases of both test interpretation and test use, the roles of evidence and social values in the overall validation process are illuminated, and test validity comes to be based on ethical as well as
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
Construct validity in psychological tests.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0040957 · Cited by 11,195
UTILITIES AND THE ISSUE OF FAIRNESS IN A DECISION THEORETIC MODEL FOR SELECTION
SAWYER, R. L., COLE, N. S., & COLE, J. W. L. (1976) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1976.tb00182.x · Cited by 47
Cited by
Messick, S. (1995) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.50.9.741 · Cited by 4,198
Self-citationTerwee, C. B., Prinsen, C. A. C., Chiarotto, A., Westerman, M. J., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L. M., de Vet, H. C. W., & Mokkink, L. B. (2018) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0 · Cited by 2,348
Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores
Kane, M. T. (2013) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/jedm.12000 · Cited by 2,110
Meaning and Values in Test Validation: The Science and Ethics of Assessment
Messick, S. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018002005 · Cited by 948
Self-citationValidity and washback in language testing
Messick, S. (1996) · Language Testing · doi:10.1177/026553229601300302 · Cited by 867
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Messick, S.
- Venue
- American Psychologist
- Published
- 1980-11
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1012-1027
- ISSN
- 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-990X
- OpenAlex
- W1971144995
- Cited by
- 862
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 23.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Test validity and the ethics of assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0003-066x.35.11.1012
- The paper
- Messick, S. (1980). Test validity and the ethics of assessment. American Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.35.11.1012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
