The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
UTILITIES AND THE ISSUE OF FAIRNESS IN A DECISION THEORETIC MODEL FOR SELECTION
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The general notions from early fairness literature transfer to (binary) classification settings and define essential concepts such as protected/demographic variables, notions of group vs individual fairness, impossibility conditions between fairness conditions, and metric-based fairness quantification.
“However, the general notions transfer to (binary) classiication settings and thus deine essential concepts such as protected/demographic variables (e.g.[72,73]), notions of group vs individual fairness (e.g.[257,278]), impossibility conditions between fairness conditions ( [81]), and metric-based fairness quantiication (e.g., true positive rates, [74]).”
From Fairness in machine learning: A survey (2024) · cites this paper as [257]
Citations
Cites
1. Bayesian Statistics a Review
Lindley, D. V. (1972) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970654.ch1 · Cited by 544
THORNDIKE, R. L. (1971) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1971.tb00907.x · Cited by 265
Lindley, D. V. (1972) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970654 · Cited by 253
AN EVALUATION OF SOME MODELS FOR CULTURE‐FAIR SELECTION
PETERSEN, N. S., & Novick, M. R. (1976) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1976.tb00178.x · Cited by 228
Linn, R. L. (1973) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543043002139 · Cited by 200
ANOTHER LOOK AT “CULTURAL FAIRNESS”1
DARLINGTON, R. B. (1971) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1971.tb00908.x · Cited by 199
Cole, N. S. (1973) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1973.tb00802.x · Cited by 168
Self-citationMethodological considerations relevant to discrimination in employment testing.
Einhorn, H. J., & Bass, A. R. (1971) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0030871 · Cited by 74
Defining a "fair" or "unbiased" selection model: A question of utilities.
Gross, A. L., & Su, W.-H. (1975) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0076630 · Cited by 70
Employment tests and discriminatory hiring
GUION, R. M. (1966) · Industrial Relations A Journal of Economy and Society · doi:10.1111/j.1468-232x.1966.tb00449.x · Cited by 59
An Expected Utility Model for “Optimal” Selection
Petersen, N. S. (1976) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.3102/10769986001004333 · Cited by 29
An Evaluation of Some Models for Test Bias. Technical Bulletin No. 23.
Petersen, N. S., & Novick, M. R. (1974) · Cited by 2
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, 1970, Guidelines on employment selection procedures, Federal Register, 35, 12
- YALE LAW JOURNAL, 1974, Business necessity under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, A no-alternative approach. Author, 84, 98
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Test validity and the ethics of assessment.
Messick, S. (1980) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.35.11.1012 · Cited by 922
Fairness in machine learning: A survey
Caton, S., & Haas, C. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3616865 · Cited by 646
Fairness in wireless networks: Issues, measures and challenges
Shi, H., Prasad, R. V., Onur, E., & Niemegeers, I. G. M. M. (2014) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2013.050113.00015 · Cited by 446
50 Years of Test (Un)fairness: Lessons for Machine Learning
Hutchinson, B., & Mitchell, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287600 · Cited by 297
Fairness in Machine Learning: A Survey
Caton, S., & Haas, C. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.04053 · Cited by 646
Cole, N. S. (1981) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.36.10.1067 · Cited by 116
Self-citationMessick, S. (1987) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2330-8516.1987.tb00244.x · Cited by 98
EQUITY IN SELECTION—WHERE PSYCHOMETRICS AND POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY MEET
Cronbach, L. J. (1976) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1976.tb00179.x · Cited by 75
Messick, S. (2000) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-4397-8_1 · Cited by 70
Antidiscrimination Insurance Pricing: Regulations, Fairness Criteria, and Models
Xin, X., & Huang, F. (2024) · North American Actuarial Journal · doi:10.1080/10920277.2023.2190528 · Cited by 43
Messick, S. (1998) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.1998.tb01797.x · Cited by 35
TEST VALIDITY AND THE ETHICS OF ASSESSMENT
Messick, S. (1979) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.1979.tb01178.x · Cited by 31
TOWARDS EQUALIZING EDUCATIONAL AND EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
Novick, M. R., & PETERSEN, N. S. (1976) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1976.tb00183.x · Cited by 30
Test Bias and the Assessment of Intelligence and Personality
Reynolds, C. R. (1995) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-5571-8_25 · Cited by 29
Ethics and Fairness in Assessing Learning Outcomes in Higher Education
Zlatkin‐Troitschanskaia, O., Reichert-Schlax, J., Jitomirski, J., Happ, R., Kühling‐Thees, C., Brückner, S., & Pant, H. A. (2019) · Higher Education Policy · doi:10.1057/s41307-019-00149-x · Cited by 28
Equal opportunity in educational and employment selection.
Novick, M. R., & Ellis, D. D. (1977) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.32.5.306 · Cited by 28
Kumar, D., Baranwal, G., & Vidyarthi, D. P. (2021) · Journal of Grid Computing · doi:10.1007/s10723-021-09593-9 · Cited by 21
A MATHEMATICAL STRUCTURE FOR ANALYZING FAIRNESS IN SELECTION1
Cronbach, L. J., Yalow, E. S., & SCHAEFFER, G. (1980) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1980.tb02363.x · Cited by 21
Ledvinka, J. (1979) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1979.tb02153.x · Cited by 17
Cultural Bias in Testing of Intelligence and Personality
Reynolds, C. R. (1998) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b0080-4270(73)00105-x · Cited by 15
On prediction-modelers and decision-makers: why fairness requires more than a fair prediction model
Scantamburlo, T., Baumann, J., & Heitz, C. (2024) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-024-01886-3 · Cited by 18
The Values of Ability Testing: Implications of Multiple Perspectives About Criteria and Standards
Messick, S. (1982) · Educational Measurement Issues and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.1982.tb00660.x · Cited by 8
PREDICTIVE BIAS IN GRADUATE ADMISSIONS TESTS
Swinton, S. S. (1981) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.1981.tb01259.x · Cited by 7
Validity and fairness of a new entry diagnostics test in higher education economics
Reichert-Schlax, J., Zlatkin‐Troitschanskaia, O., Happ, R., Pant, H. A., Jitomirski, J., Kühling‐Thees, C., Förster, M., & Brückner, S. (2020) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100900 · Cited by 7
Add-Remove-or-Relabel: Practitioner-Friendly Bias Mitigation via Influential Fairness
Richardson, B., Sattigeri, P., Wei, D., Ramamurthy, K. N., Varshney, K. R., Dhurandhar, A., & Gilbert, J. E. (2023) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594039 · Cited by 5
Ratings of Test Fairness by Human Resource Professionals
Landon, T. E., & Arvey, R. D. (2007) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00380.x · Cited by 4
Fairness and resource allocation in device-to-device wireless regional area network
Shi, H. (2014) · Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) · doi:10.4233/uuid:db220b8a-c131-4cb2-bde0-604a269703ef · Cited by 4
Educational assessment of socially and culturally different children
Davidson, G. R. (1982) · International Journal of Educational Development · doi:10.1016/0738-0593(82)90027-x · Cited by 4
STATISTICAL ISSUES RAISED BY TITLE IX REQUIREMENTS ON ADMISSION PROCEDURES1
Reed, C. W. (1976) · ETS Research Bulletin Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.1976.tb01111.x · Cited by 3
(2024) · The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2024.2326 · Cited by 2
Beller, M. (2014) · Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online · doi:10.1002/9781118445112.stat06399 · Cited by 1
THE VALUES OF ABILITY TESTING: IMPLICATIONS OF MULTIPLE PERSPECTIVES ABOUT CRITERIA AND STANDARDS*
Messick, S. (1982) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.1982.tb01305.x · Cited by 1
Beller, M. (2005) · Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/0470013192.bsa669 · Cited by 1
On Prediction-Modelers and Decision-Makers: Why Fairness Requires More Than a Fair Prediction ModelPreprint
Scantamburlo, T., Baumann, J., & Heitz, C. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.05598 · Cited by 2
Testing in College Admissions: An Alternative to the Traditional Predictive Model
Lunneborg, C. E. (1982) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.2307/1163659
Chapter 17. Neurodivergence and Intersectionality in Labor-Based Grading Contracts
Kryger, K., & Zimmerman, G. X. (2024) · The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2024.2326.2.17
Chapter 14. Ethical Considerations and Writing Assessment
Slomp, D. (2024) · The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2024.2326.2.14
Chapter 11. Moving Beyond Holistic Scoring through Validity Inquiry
O’Neill, P. (2024) · The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2024.2326.2.11
Poe, M., & Cogan, J. A. (2024) · The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2024.2326.2.15
Chapter 12. Rhetorical Writing Assessment: The Practice and Theory of Complementarity, and
Broad, B., & Boyd, M. (2024) · The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2024.2326.2.12
Retrospective. Toward Fairness in Writing Assessment
Kelly-Riley, D., Macklin, T., & Whithaus, C. (2024) · The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2024.2326.2.25
Retrospective. A Reflective Analysis: Toward Fairness, Mya Poe
Poe, M. (2024) · The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2024.2326.2.24
Villanueva, V. (2024) · The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2024.2326.3.1
Chapter 13. Articulating Sophistic Rhetoric as a Validity Heuristic for Writing Assessment
Inoue, A. B. (2024) · The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2024.2326.2.13
Chapter 18. Engaging in Resistant Genres as Antiracist Teacher Response
Wood, S. A. (2024) · The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2024.2326.2.18
Introduction to Volume 2, Emerging Theoretical and Pedagogical Practices
Kelly-Riley, D., Macklin, T., & Whithaus, C. (2024) · The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2024.2326.1.3
Henson, L., & Hern, K. (2024) · The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2024.2326.2.16
Metadata
- Authors
- SAWYER, R. L., COLE, N. S., & COLE, J. W. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Iowa (US)
- Corresponding author
- SAWYER, RICHARD L.
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Measurement
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1976-03
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 59-76
- ISSN
- 0022-0655 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-3984
- OpenAlex
- W2063203718
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2024: 14 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 4.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Educational Measurement (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Game Theory and Voting Systems
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
- Keywords
- fairness, decision theory, selection, utility functions, fairness criteria
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review