The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The dose-effect relationship in psychotherapy.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We included the number of attended sessions as a covariate for the Aim 2 analyses, as treatment dosage is directly related to treatment outcome (Howard et al., 1986).”
From The role of social support in the effectiveness of counseling for international students (2026) · cites this paper as Howard et al., 1986
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis of comparative therapy outcome studies: a replication and refinement.
Shapiro, D. A., & Shapiro, D. (1982) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.92.3.581 · Cited by 590
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The efficacy of motivational interviewing: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials
Burke, B. L., Arkowitz, H., & Menchola, M. (2003) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.71.5.843 · Cited by 1,575
Westen, D., Novotny, C. M., & Thompson-Brenner, H. (2004) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.631 · Cited by 1,212
Treatment utilization by patients with personality disorders
Bender, D. S., Dolan, R. T., Skodol, A. E., Sanislow, C. A., Dyck, I. R., McGlashan, T. H., Shea, M. T., Zanarini, M. C., Oldham, J. M., & Gunderson, J. G. (2001) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.158.2.295 · Cited by 779
The psychotherapy dose-response effect and its implications for treatment delivery services.
Hansen, N. B., Lambert, M. J., & Forman, E. M. (2002) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy.9.3.329 · Cited by 783
Drop-out from addiction treatment: A systematic review of risk factors
Brorson, H. H., Ajo Arnevik, E., Rand-Hendriksen, K., & Duckert, F. (2013) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2013.07.007 · Cited by 654
Metadata
- Authors
- Howard, K. I., Kopta, S. M., Krause, M. S., & Orlinsky, D. E.
- Venue
- American Psychologist
- Published
- 1986
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 159-164
- ISSN
- 1935-990X
- 0003-066X
- Cited by
- 891
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
