Cited by 624Migration, Health and TraumaRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchEducation and experiences of immigrants and refugees

Primary prevention of acculturative stress among refugees: application of psychological theory and practice

Williams, Carolyn L., Berry, J. W.·1991·American Psychologist

Abstract

Primary prevention in refugee mental health requires information from clinical, health, and cross-cultural psychology. Primary prevention's roots are in public health, which is distinguished by a communitywide perspective for addressing mental health concerns. This article summarizes research suggesting that refugees are an at-risk population, making them especially suitable for public health interventions. Research on stress and acculturation is highlighted, given its importance to prevention in refugee mental health. The opportunities for primary prevention programs and policies at 3 levels (i.e., local community, national, and international) are illustrated with case examples from both the United States and Canada. Prevention at the international level is highlighted by a World Health Organization Mental Health Mission to camps on the Thai-Cambodian border.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0003-066x.46.6.632

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When a dominant group damages a group's cultural institutions via cultural trauma, survivors may be brought into the dominant group's institutions in subservient roles and status, exposing them to acculturative stress, social disadvantage, and health-depriving discrimination and racism.

    “Additionally, when a dominant group damages a group’s cultural institutions via cultural trauma, survivors may be brought into the dominant group’s institutions in subservient roles and status (Berry, 1989); exposing these individuals to potential acculturative stress, social disadvantage, and health-depriving discrimination and racism (Berry, 1989; Williams and Berry, 1991).”

    From Cultural trauma as a fundamental cause of health disparities (2022) · cites this paper as Williams and Berry, 1991

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, C. L., & Berry, J. W.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
1991-06
Volume
46
Issue
6
Pages
632-641
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W2011680108
Cited by
624
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 35
FWCI
6.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and experiences of immigrants and refugees
Keywords
primary prevention, acculturative stress, refugees, refugee mental health, acculturation, public health interventions, cross-cultural psychology, vulnerable populations, mental health policy, refugee camps, Thai-Cambodian border
MeSH terms
Acculturation, Mental Disorders, Cambodia, Canada, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Emigration and Immigration, Humans, Refugees, Risk Factors, Thailand, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review