The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chaos, self-organization, and psychology.
Abstract
A variety of investigators in recent years have proposed models of psychological systems based on the concepts of chaos, nonlinear dynamics, and self-organization. Unfortunately, psychologists in general have little understanding of these important ideas. These terms are defined, and their relationships are discussed. The value of applying these concepts to psychological systems is demonstrated by exploring their utility in areas ranging from neuroscience to clinical psychology. Some of the difficulties in using nonlinear concepts and methodologies in empirical investigations are also discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Another reason to expect inconsistency in associations is the complex dynamic systems theory, which suggests that psychological processes are perpetually changing [46].”
From Using person-specific networks in psychotherapy: challenges, limitations, and how we could use them anyway (2020) · cites this paper as [46]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–222 of 222
A New perspective of substance addiction based on network theory
Liu, Y., Chuan-Peng, H., Fan, F., Sun, P., Xu, J., Yuqing, C., & Liu, X. (2021) · Advances in Psychological Science · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1042.2021.00296
From Uncertainty to Insight: An Autocatalytic FrameworkPreprint
Gabora, L. M., & Steel, M. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/yrm4k
Romanticizing Leadership: A Historical and Cultural Critique
Carlson, E. (1997) · doi:10.22371/05.1997.005
Palombo, J., Koch, B. J., & Bendicsen, H. K. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-88455-4_19
Ebert, W. (2001) · VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-322-97506-5_14
Eckert, J., Biermann-Ratjen, E.-M., & Höger, D. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/3-540-28508-3_24
The Future ofImprovement Programs
(2008) · Series on resource management · doi:10.1201/9781420051278.ch12
Tangle: A Metric for Quantifying Complexity and Erratic Behavior in Short Time SeriesPreprint
Moulder, R. G., Jr., Daniel, K. E., Teachman, B. A., et al. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/23csa
Stiles, W. B., Flores, A. L., Twomey, H. B., Surko, M., Wanicur, E., & Honos‐Webb, L. (1994) · Clinical Psychology Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2850.1994.tb00013.x
The Future of Improvement Programs
James, S. H., Nordby, P. D., Bell Jon, J., et al. (2013) · Series on resource management · doi:10.1201/b15970-13
Human Performance Variability: An Evolutionary Perspective
Smith, T. J., Henning, R. A., Wade, M. G., & Fisher, T. (2014) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b17319-15
Interactions and Cognitive Models
Leve, R. M. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-09104-9_9
Complexity Science in Organizational Behavior
Carmody‐Bubb, M. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-31929-7_5
Discrete versus Continuous Algorithms in Dynamics of Affective Decision Making
Yukalov, V. I., & Yukalova, E. P. (2023) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a16090416 · Cited by 1
Discrete Versus Continuous Algorithms in Dynamics of Affective Decision MakingPreprint
Yukalov, V. I., & Yukalova, E. P. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4558775
Love, culture, rationality, and learning in repeated games
Cendales, A., López-Montenegro, L. E., & Sierra, H. F. G. (2025) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2025.1515473
Peterson, G. W., Krumboltz, J. D., & Garmon, J. M. (2005) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/book-978-1-60752-546-220251004
Pressing on into the Era of the Digital Organization
Szabla, D. B., Mulolli, D., & Abdelaziz, W. (2023) · doi:10.1108/979-8-88730-319-220251004
Binding Problem of Consciousness
Bob, P. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-0436-1_2
Beyond Binary Thinking About Physical Reality
Sinnott, J. D. (2026) · SpringerBriefs in psychology · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-09952-5_5
Gabora, L. M. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-34178-5_28
Metadata
- Authors
- Barton, S.
- Affiliations
- Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Barton, Scott
- Venue
- American Psychologist
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-14
- ISSN
- 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-990X
- OpenAlex
- W1992788167
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 26.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Chaos, Complexity, and Education
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Systems and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Keywords
- chaos theory, self-organization, nonlinear dynamics, psychological systems, clinical psychology
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Arousal, Attention, Brain, Electroencephalography, Humans, Synaptic Transmission, Psychophysiology, Nonlinear Dynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review