The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cultural competence and evidence-based practice in mental health services: A complementary perspective
Abstract
The need for cultural competence and the need for evidence-based practice in mental health services are major issues in contemporary discourse, especially in the psychological treatment of people of color. Although these 2 paradigms are complementary in nature, there is little cross-fertilization in the psychological literature. The present article illustrates the complementary nature of these 2 paradigms. A main point of convergence is related to the development of culturally adapted interventions in the move from efficacy research to effectiveness studies. The implications of cultural adaptations of empirically supported treatments for mental health services in terms of research and practice with ethnic/racial minority populations are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There is evidence that adapted, culturally-relevant mental health programming is an effective tool for addressing poor mental health in humanitarian contexts [8,9,10,11]”
In the citing paper
“Cultural adaptations of evidence-based treatments [26, 27] and diagnostic practices [28] have been shown to successfully improve mental health in various socio-cultural settings [6, 29]”
From Masculinity and mental health treatment initiation for former political prisoners in Yangon, Myanmar – a qualitative investigation (2021) · cites this paper as [28]
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,845
Defining empirically supported therapies.
Chambless, D. L., & Hollon, S. D. (1998) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.66.1.7 · Cited by 3,067
Handbook of multicultural counseling
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-2419 · Cited by 2,635
Evidence-based practice in psychology.
American Psychological Association (2006) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.61.4.271 · Cited by 2,478
Multicultural Counseling Competencies and Standards: A Call to the Profession
SUE, D. W., ARREDONDO, P., & McDAVIS, R. J. (1992) · Journal of Counseling & Development · doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.1992.tb01642.x · Cited by 2,367
Betancourt, J. R., Green, A. R., Carrillo, J. E., & Ananeh-Firempong, O. (2003) · Public Health Reports · doi:10.1093/phr/118.4.293 · Cited by 2,327
Empirically supported psychological interventions: Controversies and evidence
Chambless, D. L., & Ollendick, T. H. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.685 · Cited by 2,097
Manese, J. E., Croteau, J. P., Helms, J. E., Horwatt, S., Boggs, K., & Stone, G. (2003) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.58.5.377 · Cited by 1,703
Update on empirically validated therapies, II: (619622010-001)
Chambless, D. L., Baker, M. J., Baucom, D. H., Beutler, L. E., Calhoun, K. S., Crits-Christoph, P., Daiuto, A., DeRubeis, R., Detweiler, J., Haaga, D. A. F., et al. (1997) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e619622010-001 · Cited by 1,488
Westen, D., Novotny, C. M., & Thompson-Brenner, H. (2004) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.631 · Cited by 1,212
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cultural adaptation of treatments: A resource for considering culture in evidence-based practice
Bernal, G., Jiménez-Chafey, M. I., & Domenech Rodríguez, M. M. (2009) · Professional Psychology: Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/a0016401 · Cited by 1,186
Issues and challenges in the design of culturally adapted evidence-based interventions
Castro, F. G., Barrera, M., & Holleran Steiker, L. K. (2010) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-033109-132032 · Cited by 796
The Case for Cultural Competency in Psychotherapeutic Interventions
Sue, S., Zane, N., Nagayama Hall, G. C., & Berger, L. K. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163651 · Cited by 662
Culturally adapted psychotherapy and the legitimacy of myth: A direct-comparison meta-analysis.
Benish, S. G., Quintana, S., & Wampold, B. E. (2011) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0023626 · Cited by 661
Cohen, A. B. (2009) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0015308 · Cited by 589
Metadata
- Authors
- Whaley, A. L., & Davis, K. E.
- Affiliations
- Hogg Foundation for Mental Health (US)
- Venue
- American Psychologist
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 563-574
- ISSN
- 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-990X
- OpenAlex
- W1968318137
- Cited by
- 458
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 81.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Cultural Competency in Health Care
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Keywords
- cultural competence, evidence-based practice, mental health services, culturally tailored interventions, people of color, empirically supported treatments, efficacy versus effectiveness, psychological intervention
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Mental Disorders, Humans, Mental Health Services, Evidence-Based Medicine, Cultural Competency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
