The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impact of behavioural difficulty on the saliency of the association between self-determined motivation and environmental behaviours.
Abstract
The goal of the study is to evaluate the impact of the perceived level of difficulty of environmental behaviours on the magnitude of the relationship between environmental self-determination and the occurrence of environmental behaviours. The participants (n = 444) completed the Motivation Toward the Environment Scale, along with self-report measures of environmental behaviours and perceived difficulty of environmental behaviours. Three types of environmental behaviours are examined: Recycling, purchasing environmentally-friendly products, and educating oneself as to what can be done for the environment. It is hypothesized that the level of self-determination of environmental motivation predicts the occurrence of environmental behaviours significantly. Moreover, the magnitude of the relationship between self-determination and environmental behaviours is expected to increase with the level of perceived difficulty of the behaviours. Data are subjected to structural equation modeling analyzes (EQS). Results support the proposed hypotheses. Self-determination displays a significant relationship with environmental behaviours, and the magnitude of this relationship increases with the difficulty of the environmental behaviour. Current environmental research trends and applied intervention strategies are discussed on the basis of this finding. Strategies for the promotion of environmental behaviours are proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation.
Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E., & Teasdale, J. D. (1978) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-843x.87.1.49 · Cited by 7,121
Self-Efficacy and Academic Motivation
Schunk, D. H. (1991) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653133 · Cited by 4,292
The support of autonomy and the control of behavior.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.53.6.1024 · Cited by 3,242
A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non‐normal Likert variables
Muthén, B., & Kaplan, D. (1985) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1985.tb00832.x · Cited by 1,778
Cited by
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 54,599
The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01 · Cited by 34,210
Self‐determination theory and work motivation
Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.322 · Cited by 7,757
Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda
Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004 · Cited by 5,089
Brown, K. W., & Kasser, T. (2005) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-004-8207-8 · Cited by 1,098
Metadata
- Authors
- Green-Demers, I., Pelletier, L. G., & Ménard, S.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 157-166
- ISSN
- 0008-400X (ISSN-L)
- 1879-2669
- OpenAlex
- W2059930710
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 20.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of behavioural difficulty on the saliency of the association between self-determined motivation and environmental behaviours. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0008-400x.29.3.157
- The paper
- Green-Demers, I., Pelletier, L. G., & Ménard, S. (1997). The impact of behavioural difficulty on the saliency of the association between self-determined motivation and environmental behaviours. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement. https://doi.org/10.1037/0008-400x.29.3.157
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.