Cited by 105Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild Abuse and TraumaChild Therapy and Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Parent–child physical play with rejected, neglected, and popular boys

MacDonald, Kevin·1987·Developmental Psychology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0012-1649.23.5.705

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
MacDonald, K.
Affiliations
California State University, Long Beach (US)
Corresponding author
MacDonald, Kevin
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
1987-09
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
705-711
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2036682880
Cited by
105
References
19
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Therapy and Development
Keywords
peer rejection, peer neglect, peer popularity, boys, peer relationships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review