Organizational perspective on cognitive control functioning and cognitive-affective balance in maltreated children.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Very young children may be less able than older children to identify cues that predict an abusive attack, and this unpredictability may produce chronic stress and hypervigilance.
“Very young children also may be less able than older children to discern the cues predictive of an abusive attack, and this lack of predictability may engender chronic stress and hypervigilance to aggression in these youngsters, even when abusive events are not occurring (Rieder & Cicchetti, 1989; Teisl & Cicchetti, 2008).”
From The Differential Impacts of Early Physical and Sexual Abuse and Internalizing Problems on Daytime Cortisol Rhythm in School-Aged Children (2010) · cites this paper as Rieder & Cicchetti, 1989
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 224
- Authors
- Rieder, C., & Cicchetti, D.
- Affiliations
- McLean Hospital (US)
- University of Rochester (US)
- ORCID
- Cicchetti, Dante
- Venue
- Developmental Psychology
- Published
- 1989-05
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 382-393
- ISSN
- 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-0599
- OpenAlex
- W2000417922
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 12.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
- Keywords
- cognitive control, child abuse, maltreated children, executive function, emotion regulation, organizational perspective
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
