Conditions under which young children can hold two rules in mind and inhibit a prepotent response.

Abstract

The day-night task requires saying "night" to a picture of the sun and "day" to a picture of the moon. In this investigation of why young children fail at this task, systematic variations of the task were administered to 96 children, half 4 years old and half 4 1/2 years old. Training children on the strategy of chunking the 2 rules into I ("say the opposite"), thus reducing memory load, did not help their performance. What helped was reducing the inhibitory demand by instructing them to say "dog" and "pig" (not "night" and "day") even though memory of 2 rules and inhibiting saying what the pictures represented were still required. Here the response to be activated and the response to be inhibited were unrelated. When the correct response was semantically related to, and the direct opposite of, the to-be-inhibited response, children performed poorly. Inserting a delay between stimulus and response helped even though that delay was filled with distraction. Young children apparently need several seconds to compute the answer on this task. Often they do not take the needed time; when forced to do so, they do well.

Cites (66)

1. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
   Stroop, J. R. · 1935 · Journal of Experimental Psychology
2. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. B
   HighWire Press · 1886
3. Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex
   Bush, George, Luu, Phan, Posner, Michael I. · 2000 · Trends in Cognitive Sciences
4. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review.
   MacLeod, Colin M. · 1991 · Psychological Bulletin
5. Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention.
   James H. Neely · 1977 · Journal of Experimental Psychology General
6. A spreading activation theory of memory.
   Anderson, John R. · 1983 · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
7. Remembrance of places passed: Spatial memory in rats.
   Olton, David S., Samuelson, Robert J. · 1976 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes
8. Principles of Frontal Lobe Function
   2002 · Oxford University Press eBooks
9. The relationship between cognition and action: performance of children 312–7 years old on a stroop- like day-night test
   Gerstadt, Cherie L., Hong, Yoon Joo, Diamond, Adele · 1994 · Cognition
10. Three-year-olds’ difficulty with false belief: The case for a conceptual deficit
    Perner, Josef, Leekam, Susan R., Wimmer, Heinz · 1987 · British Journal of Developmental Psychology

Show all 66 references

Cited by (29)

1. Executive functions
   Diamond, Adele · 2013 · Annual Review of Psychology
2. Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: a meta-analytic study.
   Bar-Haim, Yair, Lamy, Dominique, Pergamin, Lee, Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J., van IJzendoorn, Marinus H. · 2007 · Psychological Bulletin
3. Executive function in preschoolers: A review using an integrative framework.
   Garon, Nancy, Bryson, Susan E., Smith, Isabel M. · 2008 · Psychological Bulletin
4. Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: Evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching.
   Davidson, Matthew C., Amso, Dima, Anderson, Loren Cruess, Diamond, Adele · 2006 · Neuropsychologia
5. Developmentally Sensitive Measures of Executive Function in Preschool Children
   Carlson, Stephanie M. · 2005 · Developmental Neuropsychology

See all 382