Cited by 13,268Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Abilities and TestingDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Executive functions

Open access
Diamond, Adele·2013·Annual Review of Psychology

Abstract

Executive functions (EFs) make possible mentally playing with ideas; taking the time to think before acting; meeting novel, unanticipated challenges; resisting temptations; and staying focused. Core EFs are inhibition [response inhibition (self-control—resisting temptations and resisting acting impulsively) and interference control (selective attention and cognitive inhibition)], working memory, and cognitive flexibility (including creatively thinking “outside the box,” seeing anything from different perspectives, and quickly and flexibly adapting to changed circumstances). The developmental progression and representative measures of each are discussed. Controversies are addressed (e.g., the relation between EFs and fluid intelligence, self-regulation, executive attention, and effortful control, and the relation between working memory and inhibition and attention). The importance of social, emotional, and physical health for cognitive health is discussed because stress, lack of sleep, loneliness, or lack of exercise each impair EFs. That EFs are trainable and can be improved with practice is addressed, including diverse methods tried thus far.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750

Cites

278 of 278 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 'working' component of working memory can be fractionated into continuous updating, dual-processing, and serial-temporal reordering; the 'memory' component can be fractionated into verbal, visual, and spatial short-term storage systems.

    “the ‘working’ component can be fractionated into interrelated but distinguishable subprocesses involving continuous updating, dual-processing and serial-temporal reordering, and the ‘memory’ component can be fractionated into distinct verbal, visual and spatial short-term storage systems (Figure 1).20,56,152”

    From Executive function deficits in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder (2024) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Working Memory section describes updating and mentally reordering information, and Working Memory Versus Short-Term Memory distinguishes manipulation from simple storage (page not available in our copy). It does not present dual-processing as a distinct subprocess or divide short-term storage into separate verbal, visual, and spatial systems. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Working memory can be divided into a 'working' component (mental processes operating on held information) and a 'memory' component (short-term memory, passive storage and rehearsal).

    “working memory can be divided into its ‘working’ component (the mental processes that operate on mentally held information) and ‘memory’ component (short-term memory, the passive storage and rehearsal mechanisms that temporarily hold information in mind).”

    From Executive function deficits in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder (2024) · cites this paper as [20]

    In “Working Memory,” Diamond describes holding information in mind and mentally working with it. In “Working Memory Versus Short-Term Memory,” she distinguishes that from merely holding information in mind. The copy does not divide working memory into the two named components or describe rehearsal as part of a memory component; page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Inhibition is a critical executive function that supports various cognitive domains, including learning, motor control, and decision-making, particularly under time pressure.

    “Inhibition is a critical executive function that supports various cognitive domains, including learning, motor control, and decision-making, particularly under time pressure [93,94,95,96].”

    From ADHD Children Take More Time to Inhibit Automatic Responses: A Comparison with Anxiety Disorders Using NEPSY-II (2025) · cites this paper as [96]

    The Inhibitory Control section identifies inhibition as a core executive function that governs attention and action, while the Working Memory section explains how it helps maintain focus—supporting the claim’s general point about cognition, learning, and behavior. The paper also links inhibitory control to avoiding impulsive choices, but it does not establish the broader claim that inhibition supports learning, motor control, and decision-making particularly under time pressure; its example instead says that giving children time to respond reduces errors. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Traditional assessment methods for ADHD have highlighted differences in executive functions in people with ADHD compared with neurotypical peers.

    “Traditional assessment methods for ADHD, which have been used since the 1980s, have highlighted the differences in executive functions (EFs) in people with ADHD compared with their neurotypical peers.”

    From Enhancing Ecological Validity: Virtual Reality Assessment of Executive Functioning in Children and Adolescents with ADHD (2024) · cites this paper as [3]

    The “Canary in the Coal Mine” section describes ADHD as a disorder of executive functions, and “Differences and Similarities Between Executive Functions and Related Terms” says EFs have historically been assessed with laboratory tests. Neither passage says that traditional ADHD assessments, used since the 1980s, demonstrated differences between people with ADHD and neurotypical peers. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Diamond's model is more focused on the four executive processes classically identified in children, structured through a hierarchical and age-differentiated development and interrelationships between the executive components.

    “However, Diamond (2013) model is more focused on the four executive processes classically identified in children, structured through a hierarchical and age-differentiated development and interrelationships between the executive components.”

    From Assessment of executive functions in school-aged children: A narrative review (2022) · cites this paper as Diamond (2013)

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes a hierarchy in which higher-order executive functions are built from core functions, and the sections on development discuss age-related changes and relationships among components. But the Introduction explicitly identifies three core executive functions—not the four processes attributed to Diamond’s model—and the paper also discusses adults, rather than focusing only on children. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Casey BJ Siegler RS McClelland JL Development and disruption of inhibitory mechanisms of attention 2001 Vol. 28 327 49 Mechanisms of Cognitive Development: The Carnegie Symposium on Cognition Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ
  2. Cohen JR Berkman ET Lieberman MD Ventrolateral PFC as a self-control muscle and how to use it without trying Oxford Handb. Frontal Lobe Funct 2012 In press
  3. Luna B Merriam EP Minshew NJ Keshavan MS Genovese CR Response inhibition improves from late childhood to adulthood: eye movement and fMRI studies 1999 Proc. 6th Annu. Meet. Cogn. Neurosci. Meet. Washington, DC
  4. Monsell S Driver J Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII 2000 MIT Press Cambridge, MA The best single source theory and research task switching (set shifting).
  5. Nelson JM Sheffield TD Chevalier N Clark CAC Espy KA McCardle P Freund L Griffin JA Psychobiology of executive function in early development Executive Function in Preschool Age Children: Integrating Measurement, Neurodevelopment and Translational Research 2012 Am. Psychol. Assoc. Washington, DC In press
  6. Piaget J Gattegno C Hodgson FM The Child’s Conception of Number 1952/1941 Routledge & Kegan Paul London
  7. Posner MI DiGirolamo GJ Parasuraman R Executive attention: conflict, target detection, and cognitive control The Attentive Brain 1998 401 23 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
  8. Rothbart MK Bates JE Damon W Eisenberg N Temperament Handbook of Child Psychology 2006 Vol. 3: Social Emotional and Personality Development 105 76 Wiley New York

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Diamond, A.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Diamond, Adele
Venue
Annual Review of Psychology
Published
2013-01-03
Volume
64
Issue
1
Pages
135-168
ISSN
  • 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2085
OpenAlex
W4211081781
Cited by
13,268
References
278
Citations by year
2026: 1814 · 2025: 1708 · 2024: 1488 · 2023: 1441 · 2022: 1376 · 2021: 1326 · 2020: 1065 · 2019: 949 · 2018: 706 · 2017: 568 · 2016: 399 · 2015: 252 · 2014: 124 · 2013: 38
FWCI
10.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA019685)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD035453)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
executive function, response inhibition, self-control, interference control, selective attention, working memory, cognitive flexibility, fluid intelligence, self-regulation, executive attention, effortful control, cognitive development, stress, sleep deprivation, loneliness, physical activity
MeSH terms
Attention, Cognition, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Intelligence, Memory, Short-Term, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review