The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hands in the air: Using ungrounded iconic gestures to teach children conservation of quantity.
Open accessAbstract
Including gesture in instruction facilitates learning. Why? One possibility is that gesture points out objects in the immediate context and thus helps ground the words learners hear in the world they see. Previous work on gesture's role in instruction has used gestures that either point to or trace paths on objects, thus providing support for this hypothesis. The experiments described here investigated the possibility that gesture helps children learn even when it is not produced in relation to an object but is instead produced "in the air." Children were given instruction in Piagetian conservation problems with or without gesture and with or without concrete objects. The results indicate that children given instruction with speech and gesture learned more about conservation than children given instruction with speech alone, whether or not objects were present during instruction. Gesture in instruction can thus help learners learn even when those gestures do not direct attention to visible objects, suggesting that gesture can do more for learners than simply ground arbitrary, symbolic language in the physical, observable world.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Explaining Math: Gesturing Lightens the Load
Goldin-Meadow, S., Nusbaum, H., Kelly, S. D., & Wagner, S. (2001) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00395 · Cited by 842
Making children gesture brings out implicit knowledge and leads to learning
Broaders, S. C., Cook, S. W., Mitchell, Z., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.539 · Cited by 397
Cited by
Gesture, sign, and language: The coming of age of sign language and gesture studies
Goldin-Meadow, S., & Brentari, D. (2017) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x15001247 · Cited by 363
Self-citationGesturing Saves Cognitive Resources When Talking About Nonpresent Objects
Ping, R., & Goldin‐Meadow, S. (2010) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01102.x · Cited by 230
Self-citationGoldin‐Meadow, S. (2011) · WIREs Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.132 · Cited by 134
Self-citationStudents learn more when their teacher has learned to gesture effectively
Alibali, M. W., Young, A. G., Crooks, N. M., Yeo, A., Wolfgram, M. S., Ledesma, I. M., Nathan, M. J., Breckinridge Church, R., & Knuth, E. J. (2013) · Gesture · doi:10.1075/gest.13.2.05ali · Cited by 101
The cognitive effects of computational thinking: a systematic review and meta-analytic study
Montuori, C., Gambarota, F., Altoé, G., & Arfé, B. (2024) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104961 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Ping, R. M., & Goldin-Meadow, S.
- Venue
- Developmental Psychology
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1277-1287
- ISSN
- 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-0599
- OpenAlex
- W2075880479
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hands in the air: Using ungrounded iconic gestures to teach children conservation of quantity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0012-1649.44.5.1277
- The paper
- Ping, R. M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2008). Hands in the air: Using ungrounded iconic gestures to teach children conservation of quantity. Developmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.5.1277
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.