Cited by 207Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceAttachment and Relationship DynamicsMarriage and Sexual Relationships

Negative reciprocity and communication in couples with a violent husband.

Cordova, James V., Jacobson, Neil S., Gottman, John M., Rushe, Regina, Cox, Gary·1993·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

To better understand the relationship dynamics of couples experiencing husband-to-wife violence, the interaction patterns of 29 domestically violent (DV), 15 distressed but nonviolent (DNV), and 13 happily married (HM) couples were examined using the Marital Interaction Coding System and lag sequential analyses. DV spouses were generally more often aversive and less often facilitative than nonviolent couples. DV couples were significantly more likely to engage in negative reciprocity than their DNV or their HM counterparts. DV wives were as likely as their husbands to reciprocate negative behavior. Furthermore, no support was found for a negative reinforcement hypothesis that husbands' aversiveness was shaped or maintained by wives' capitulation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-843x.102.4.559

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Physical IPV rarely occurs in the absence of emotional IPV.

    “Evidence exists of the co-emergence of forms of physical IPV and emotional IPV in cross-sectional studies, which have highlighted that physical IPV rarely occurs in the absence of emotional IPV (Burman et al., 1992;Carney & Barner, 2012;Cordova et al., 1993;Lloyd, 1996;Margolin et al., 1988;Sabourin et al., 1993).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 19 · Cited by 207

Authors
Cordova, J. V., Jacobson, N. S., Gottman, J. M., Rushe, R., & Cox, G.
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
1993-11
Volume
102
Issue
4
Pages
559-564
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2014581917
Cited by
207
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Clark Digital Commons (Clark University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh043101-06)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (5RO1 MH43101-03)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
Keywords
domestic violence, intimate partner violence, negative reciprocity, facilitative communication, capitulation, relational dynamics
MeSH terms
Adult, Communication, Conflict, Psychological, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Male, Marriage, Middle Aged, Personality Assessment, Reinforcement, Psychology, Spouse Abuse, Violence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review