The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reliability of DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders: implications for the classification of emotional disorders
Abstract
The reliability of current and lifetime Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For SAD, the ADIS-IV has demonstrated adequate reliability (Brown, DiNardo, Lehmann, & Campbell, 2001).”
From Changes in Decentering Across Cognitive Behavioral Group Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder (2018) · cites this paper as Brown, DiNardo, Lehmann, & Campbell, 2001
In the citing paper
“For SAD, the ADIS-IV has demonstrated adequate reliability (Brown, DiNardo, Lehmann, & Campbell, 2001).”
From Examining the Interrelation Among Change Processes: Decentering and Anticipatory Processing Across Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder. (2019) · cites this paper as Brown, DiNardo, Lehmann, & Campbell, 2001
In the citing paper
“This measure has demonstrated excellent to acceptable interrater reliability for the anxiety and mood disorders (Brown, Di Nardo, Lehman, & Campbell, 2001).”
From The role of negative affectivity and negative reactivity to emotions in predicting outcomes in the unified protocol for the transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders (2012) · cites this paper as Brown, Di Nardo, Lehman, & Campbell, 2001
In the citing paper
“The ADIS-IV has demonstrated excellent inter-rater reliability (Brown, Di Nardo, Lehman, & Campbell, 2001).”
From Trajectories of social anxiety, cognitive reappraisal, and mindfulness during an RCT of CBGT versus MBSR for social anxiety disorder (2017) · cites this paper as Brown, Di Nardo, Lehman, & Campbell, 2001
In the citing paper
“The ADIS-IV has been shown to be a reliable and valid measure of DSM-IV (American Psychiatric Association, 2000) anxiety and mood disorders (Brown, DiNardo, Lehman, & Campbell, 2001).”
From Integrated cognitive behavioral therapy for comorbid cannabis use and anxiety disorders: A pilot randomized controlled trial (2019) · cites this paper as Brown, DiNardo, Lehman, & Campbell, 2001
In the citing paper
“The ADIS-IV-L has demonstrated good (e.g., GAD κ = 0.67; MDD and dysthymia κ = 0.72) to excellent (e.g., panic disorder with agoraphobia and social anxiety disorder κ = 0.77; OCD κ = 0.85) interrater reliability for the anxiety and mood disorders (Brown et al., 2001).”
From Intolerance of Uncertainty: A Common Factor in the Treatment of Emotional Disorders (2013) · cites this paper as Brown et al., 2001
In the citing paper
“All independent evaluators in the trial were trained to a high level of reliability and underwent a rigorous certification process (see Brown et al., 2001).”
From Intolerance of Uncertainty: A Common Factor in the Treatment of Emotional Disorders (2013) · cites this paper as Brown et al., 2001
In the citing paper
“With the exception of Dysthymic Disorder, test reliability was good to excellent (kappas ranging from 0.60 to 0.86) in diagnostic categories contained in the anxiety and mood disorder modules.30”
From Prenatal Depression in Women Hospitalized for Obstetric Risk (2008) · cites this paper as [30]
In the citing paper
“The instrument has been reported to have good to excellent reliability (kappas.58-.81;Brown, DiNardo, Lehman and Campbell, 2001).”
From Cognitive-behavioural bibliotherapy for hypochondriasis: A pilot study (2009) · cites this paper as Brown, DiNardo, Lehman and Campbell, 2001
In the citing paper
“Good interrater reliability has been reported for the severity of GAD (r=0.72) [52].”
In the citing paper
“Disorder severity will be assessed with the validated 0 to 8 clinical severity rating (CSR) scale for each DSM disorder detected at the clinical or sub-clinical level [91].”
In the citing paper
“The CSR rating has demonstrated good to excellent interrater reliability for anxiety disorders (Brown et al., 2001; Craske et al., 2007).”
From Cognitive mediators of treatment for social anxiety disorder: comparing acceptance and commitment therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy. (2014) · cites this paper as Brown et al., 2001
In the citing paper
“With the exception of dysthymia, diagnosis of psychological disorders using the ADIS-IV evidenced good to excellent interrater reliability (κs range from .67 to .86; Brown, Di Nardo, Lehman, & Campbell, 2001).”
From Cognitive mediators of treatment for social anxiety disorder: comparing acceptance and commitment therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy. (2014) · cites this paper as Brown, Di Nardo, Lehman, & Campbell, 2001
In the citing paper
“Brown, Di Nardo, Lehman and Campbell (2001) found that the diagnostic reliability of the anxiety disorders obtained with the ADIS-IV is good, with improvements over the ADIS-R (Di Nardo & Barlow, 1988).”
From A randomized clinical trial of cognitive-behavioral therapy and applied relaxation for adults with generalized anxiety disorder. (2010) · cites this paper as Brown, Di Nardo, Lehman and Campbell (2001)
In the citing paper
“The diagnostic reliability of the ADIS–IV–L for principal DSM–IV anxiety and mood disorders is good to excellent in rater agreement (κ = .77 for PDA principal diagnosis; Brown, Di Nardo, Lehman, & Campbell, 2001).”
From Respiratory and cognitive mediators of treatment change in panic disorder: Evidence for intervention specificity. (2010) · cites this paper as Brown, Di Nardo, Lehman, & Campbell, 2001
Citations
Cites
Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1991) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.100.3.316 · Cited by 4,601
The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID)
Williams, J. B. W. (1992) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820080038006 · Cited by 1,641
Brown, T. A., Chorpita, B. F., & Barlow, D. H. (1998) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.107.2.179 · Cited by 1,400
Self-citationBorkovec, T. D., & Costello, E. (1993) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.61.4.611 · Cited by 756
Worrying: Perspectives on theory, assessment and treatment
Carmin, C. N. (1995) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/0272-7358(95)90175-2 · Cited by 500
Di Nardo, P. A. (1993) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820160009001 · Cited by 498
Large sample variance of kappa in the case of different sets of raters.
Fleiss, J. L., Nee, J. C. M., & Landis, J. R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.5.974 · Cited by 408
Symptom structure in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a confirmatory factor-analytic study
Summerfeldt, L. J., Richter, M. A., Antony, M. M., & Swinson, R. P. (1999) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(98)00134-x · Cited by 352
Comorbidity of Mood and Anxiety Disorders
Black, J. L. (1991) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/s0025-6196(12)62407-0 · Cited by 333
Comorbidity among anxiety disorders: Implications for treatment and DSM-IV..
Brown, T. A., & Barlow, D. H. (1992) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.60.6.835 · Cited by 320
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- 1994, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders.
- 10.1016/S0005-7967(97)00075-2 · DOI
- Baer, 1994, Factor analysis of symptoms subtypes of obsessive-compulsive disorder and their relation to personality and tic disorders., The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 55, 18
- Blashfield, 1990, Comorbidity and classification., 61
- Borkovec, 1994, The nature, functions, and origins of worry., 5
- Brown, 1996, Validity of the DSM-III-R and DSM-IV classification systems for anxiety disorders., 21
- Di Nardo, 1988, Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule-Revised (ADIS-R).
- Di Nardo, 1994, Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV: Lifetime version (ADIS-IV-L).
- Frances, 1990, The influence of classification methods on comorbidity., 41
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toward a unified treatment for emotional disorders
Barlow, D. H., Allen, L. B., & Choate, M. L. (2004) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(04)80036-4 · Cited by 1,430
Rethinking the mood and anxiety disorders: A quantitative hierarchical model for DSM-V.
Watson, D. (2005) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.114.4.522 · Cited by 1,332
Brown, T. A., Campbell, L. A., Lehman, C. L., Grisham, J. R., & Mancill, R. B. (2001) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-843x.110.4.585 · Cited by 1,562
Self-citationRegier, D. A., Narrow, W. E., Clarke, D. E., Kraemer, H. C., Kuramoto, S. J., Kuhl, E. A., & Kupfer, D. J. (2013) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12070999 · Cited by 1,163
Preliminary evidence for an emotion dysregulation model of generalized anxiety disorder
Mennin, D. S., Heimberg, R. G., Turk, C. L., & Fresco, D. M. (2005) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2004.08.008 · Cited by 919
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, T. A., Di Nardo, P. A., Lehman, C. L., & Campbell, L. A.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Abnormal Psychology
- Published
- 2001-02
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-58
- ISSN
- 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1846
- OpenAlex
- W2047307274
- Cited by
- 887
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 42
- FWCI
- 38.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Keywords
- DSM-IV, anxiety disorders, mood disorders, diagnostic reliability, interobserver agreement, diagnostic criteria, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Diagnosis, Differential, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Severity of Illness Index, Reproducibility of Results, Observer Variation, Mood Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
