The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development and test of a new model for validity generalization.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Using simulations, Callender and Osburn (1980) show that the Fisher z transformed correlation coefficients severely underestimate the true variance of the correlation coefficients.”
From A Meta-Analysis of Organizational Complaint Handling and Customer Responses (2011) · cites this paper as Callender and Osburn (1980)
Citations
Cites
Continuous Univariate Distributions.
Omori, Y., Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S., & Balakrishnan, N. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2291547 · Cited by 9,085
Rozeboom, W. W., Lord, F. M., Novick, M. R., & Birnbaum, A. (1969) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.2307/1162101 · Cited by 8,012
Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization.
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1977) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.62.5.529 · Cited by 769
The Validity of Occupational Aptitude Tests.
Guion, R. M., & Ghiselli, E. Ε. (1967) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391224 · Cited by 371
Pearlman, K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1980) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.65.4.373 · Cited by 343
Validity generalization results for computer programmers.
Schmidt, F. L., Gast-Rosenberg, I., & Hunter, J. E. (1980) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.65.6.643 · Cited by 166
FURTHER TESTS OF THE SCHMIDT‐HUNTER BAYESIAN VALIDITY GENERALIZATION PROCEDURE1
Schmidt, F. L., Pearlman, K., Hunter, J. E., & Shane, G. S. (1979) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1979.tb02134.x · Cited by 148
PREDICTORS, CRITERIA, AND SIGNIFICANT RESULTS
LENT, R. H., Aurbach, H. A., & Levin, L. S. (1971) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1971.tb00374.x · Cited by 63
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–112 of 112
Kisamore, J. L. (2003) · Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · Cited by 2
Multistage Artifact Correction: An Illustration With Structured Employment Interviews
Huffcutt, A. I., Culbertson, S. S., & Weyhrauch, W. S. (2014) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1017/s1754942600006878 · Cited by 1
Maximum Likelihood Estimation in Validity Generalization with Examples
Raju, N. S., & Blitz, D. L. (2003) · Cited by 1
Krausert, A. (2009) · Contributions to management science · doi:10.1007/978-3-7908-2197-0_4 · Cited by 2
Law, K. S. (1992) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.77.6.986 · Cited by 1
Viswesvaran, C. (2002) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428102005002006 · Cited by 1
Kisamore, J. L. (2003) · Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)
Fabi, B., & Maillet, L. (1987) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1987.60.2.431
Schmidt, F. L. (2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118133880.hop202020
Range Restriction in Employment Interviews
Huffcutt, A. I. (2020) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-64802-090-220251009
A Critique of Validity Generalization
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Mulaik, S. A. (1994) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-2202-3_2
Metadata
- Authors
- Callender, J. C., & Osburn, H. G.
- Affiliations
- Procter & Gamble (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 1980-10
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 543-558
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W2010337660
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 14.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Keywords
- validity generalization, model development, model testing, personnel selection, job performance prediction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
