Cited by 112Psychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Testing and AssessmentMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development and test of a new model for validity generalization.

Callender, John C., Osburn, H. G.·1980·Journal of Applied Psychology

DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.65.5.543

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-9010.65.5.543

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Continuous Univariate Distributions.
Omori, Y., Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S., & Balakrishnan, N. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2291547 · Cited by 9,085
Reviews: Lord, Frederic M., and Novick, Melvin R. (with contributions by Allan Birnbaum). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1968. xii + 568 pp. $14.95.
Rozeboom, W. W., Lord, F. M., Novick, M. R., & Birnbaum, A. (1969) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.2307/1162101 · Cited by 8,012
Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization.
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1977) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.62.5.529 · Cited by 769
The Validity of Occupational Aptitude Tests.
Guion, R. M., & Ghiselli, E. Ε. (1967) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391224 · Cited by 371
Validity generalization results for tests used to predict job proficiency and training success in clerical occupations.
Pearlman, K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1980) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.65.4.373 · Cited by 343
Validity generalization results for computer programmers.
Schmidt, F. L., Gast-Rosenberg, I., & Hunter, J. E. (1980) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.65.6.643 · Cited by 166
FURTHER TESTS OF THE SCHMIDT‐HUNTER BAYESIAN VALIDITY GENERALIZATION PROCEDURE1
Schmidt, F. L., Pearlman, K., Hunter, J. E., & Shane, G. S. (1979) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1979.tb02134.x · Cited by 148
PREDICTORS, CRITERIA, AND SIGNIFICANT RESULTS
LENT, R. H., Aurbach, H. A., & Levin, L. S. (1971) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1971.tb00374.x · Cited by 63

Show all 8 references

Sorted by citations

The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis
(2019) · doi:10.7758/9781610448864 · Cited by 4,553
PERSONALITY MEASURES AS PREDICTORS OF JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYTIC REVIEW
Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., & Rothstein, M. G. (1991) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00696.x · Cited by 1,481
Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance.
Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.96.1.72 · Cited by 2,107
The Affective Underpinnings of Job Perceptions and Attitudes: A Meta-Analytic Review and Integration.
Thoresen, C. J., Kaplan, S. A., Barsky, A. P., Warren, C. R., & de Chermont, K. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.6.914 · Cited by 617
Fixed effects vs. random effects meta-analysis models: implications for cumulative research knowledge.
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2000) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00156 · Cited by 833
Fixed‐ versus random‐effects models in meta‐analysis: Model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results
Schmidt, F. L., Oh, I., & Hayes, T. L. (2008) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1348/000711007x255327 · Cited by 729
Handbook of Industrial, Work & Organizational Psychology
Anderson, N. R., Öneş, D. S., Sinangil, H. K., & Viswesvaran, C. (2001) · Sage eBooks · Cited by 632
What do data really mean? Research findings, meta-analysis, and cumulative knowledge in psychology.
Schmidt, F. L. (1992) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.47.10.1173 · Cited by 564
METAANALYSES OF VALIDITY STUDIES PUBLISHED BETWEEN 1964 AND 1982 AND THE INVESTIGATION OF STUDY CHARACTERISTICS
Schmitt, N., Gooding, R. Z., Noe, R. A., & Kirsch, M. P. (1984) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1984.tb00519.x · Cited by 554
THE EMPLOYMENT INTERVIEW: A SUMMARY AND REVIEW OF RECENT RESEARCH1
Arvey, R. D., & Campion, J. E. (1982) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1982.tb02197.x · Cited by 539
A Meta-Analysis of Organizational Complaint Handling and Customer Responses
Gelbrich, K., & Roschk, H. (2011) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670510387914 · Cited by 481
Employment testing: Old theories and new research findings.
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1981) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.36.10.1128 · Cited by 354
Validity of personnel decisions: A conceptual analysis of the inferential and evidential bases.
Binning, J. F., & Barrett, G. V. (1989) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.3.478 · Cited by 345
Validity generalization results for tests used to predict job proficiency and training success in clerical occupations.
Pearlman, K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1980) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.65.4.373 · Cited by 343
Implications of direct and indirect range restriction for meta-analysis methods and findings.
Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Le, H. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.594 · Cited by 330
Principles for the Validation and Use of Personnel Selection Procedures
Anonymous (2018) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1017/iop.2018.195 · Cited by 316
An Evaluation of the Validity of Correlational Research Conducted in Organizations
Mitchell, T. R. (1985) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1985.4277939 · Cited by 279
Inspection time and intelligence: A meta-analysis
Kranzler, J. H., & Jensen, A. R. (1989) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0160-2896(89)80006-6 · Cited by 239
FORTY QUESTIONS ABOUT VALIDITY GENERALIZATION AND META‐ANALYSIS
Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., Pearlman, K., Hirsh, H. R., Sackett, P. R., Schmitt, N., Tenopyr, M. L., Kehoe, J. F., & Zedeck, S. (1985) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1985.tb00565.x · Cited by 219
The relative importance of intelligence and motivation as predictors of school achievement: A meta-analysis
Kriegbaum, K., Becker, N., & Spinath, B. (2018) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2018.10.001 · Cited by 277
Increased accuracy for range restriction corrections: implications for the role of personality and general mental ability in job and training performance.
SCHMIDT, F. L., SHAFFER, J. A., & OH, I. (2008) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00132.x · Cited by 190
Individual demographic differences and job satisfaction
Brush, D. H., Moch, M. K., & Pooyan, A. (1987) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.4030080205 · Cited by 192
Validity generalization results for computer programmers.
Schmidt, F. L., Gast-Rosenberg, I., & Hunter, J. E. (1980) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.65.6.643 · Cited by 166
USING RANDOM RATHER THAN FIXED EFFECTS MODELS IN META‐ANALYSIS: IMPLICATIONS FOR SITUATIONAL SPECIFICITY AND VALIDITY GENERALIZATION
EREZ, A., BLOOM, M. C., & WELLS, M. T. (1996) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01801.x · Cited by 161
A new meta-analytic approach.
Raju, N. S., Burke, M. J., Normand, J., & Langlois, G. M. (1991) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.3.432 · Cited by 152
The problem of group differences in ability test scores in employment selection
Schmidt, F. L. (1988) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/0001-8791(88)90040-1 · Cited by 147
Meta-Analysis and the Development of Knowledge
Chan, M. E., & Arvey, R. D. (2012) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691611429355 · Cited by 132
Comparison of two random-effects methods of meta-analysis.
Hall, S. M., & Brannick, M. T. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.377 · Cited by 79
Refinements in validity generalization methods: Implications for the situational specificity hypothesis.
Schmidt, F. L., Law, K. S., Hunter, J. E., Rothstein, H. R., Pearlman, K., & McDaniel, M. A. (1993) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.3 · Cited by 108
Quantifying the effects of psychological interventions on employee job performance and work-force productivity.
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1983) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.38.4.473 · Cited by 104
Developments in the Criterion–related Validation of Selection Procedures: A Critical Review and Recommendations for Practice
VAN IDDEKINGE, C. H., & PLOYHART, R. E. (2008) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00133.x · Cited by 101
INCREASING THE ACCURACY OF CORRECTIONS FOR RANGE RESTRICTION: IMPLICATIONS FOR SELECTION PROCEDURE VALIDITIES AND OTHER RESEARCH RESULTS
Schmidt, F. L., Oh, I., & Le, H. (2006) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00065.x · Cited by 99
VALIDITY
Messick, S. (1987) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2330-8516.1987.tb00244.x · Cited by 98
Validity generalization in the context of situational models.
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., Mulaik, S. A., & Ladd, R. T. (1992) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.77.1.3 · Cited by 89
Moderator regression and the cusp catastrophe: Application of two-stage personnel selection, training, therapy, and policy evaluation
Guastello, S. J. (1982) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/bs.3830270305 · Cited by 81
Validity generalization results for two job groups in the petroleum industry.
Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., & Caplan, J. R. (1981) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.66.3.261 · Cited by 80
A note on validity generalization procedures.
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Mulaik, S. A. (1986) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.440 · Cited by 72
History and development of the Schmidt–Hunter meta‐analysis methods
Schmidt, F. L. (2015) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1134 · Cited by 60
Corrections for Attenuation and Range Restriction on the Predictor
Mendoza, J. L., & Mumford, M. D. (1987) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.3102/10769986012003282 · Cited by 60
Moderating effects of decision-making/information-processing job dimensions on test validities.
Gutenberg, R. L., Arvey, R. D., Osburn, H. G., & Jeanneret, P. R. (1983) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.68.4.602 · Cited by 59
Self-citation
Validity Generalization for Cognitive, Psychomotor, and perceptual Tests for Craft Jobs in the Utility Industry
Levine, E. L., Spector, P. E., Menon, S., & Narayanan, L. (1996) · Human Performance · doi:10.1207/s15327043hup0901_1 · Cited by 58
Extension of the Schmidt and Hunter validity generalization procedure to the prediction of absenteeism behavior from knowledge of job satisfaction and organizational commitment.
Terborg, J. R., Lee, T., Smith, F. J., Davis, G. A., & Turbin, M. S. (1982) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.67.4.440 · Cited by 58
An unbiased correction for sampling error in validity generalization studies.
Hedges, L. V. (1989) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.3.469 · Cited by 55
Correcting for indirect range restriction in meta-analysis: Testing a new meta-analytic procedure.
Le, H. Q., & Schmidt, F. L. (2006) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.11.4.416 · Cited by 53
Realizing the full potential of psychometric meta-analysis for a cumulative science and practice of human resource management
Öneş, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F. L. (2016) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.09.011 · Cited by 56
Testing the constancy of validity with computer-generated sampling distributions of the multiplicative model variance estimate: Results for petroleum industry validation research.
Callender, J. C., & Osburn, H. G. (1981) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.66.3.274 · Cited by 53
Self-citation
THE EFFECTS OF RANGE RESTRICTION ON ESTIMATES OF CRITERION INTERRATER RELIABILITY: IMPLICATIONS FOR VALIDATION RESEARCH
Sackett, P. R., Laczo, R. M., & Arvey, R. D. (2002) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00130.x · Cited by 50
Admissions testing on trial.
Linn, R. L. (1982) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.37.3.279 · Cited by 50
A test of two refinements in procedures for meta-analysis.
Law, K. S., Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1994) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.6.978 · Cited by 49
Validity generalization and situational specificity: A second look at the 75% rule and Fisher's z transformation
Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., & Raju, N. S. (1988) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.73.4.665 · Cited by 74
Nonlinearity of range corrections in meta-analysis: Test of an improved procedure.
Law, K. S., Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1994) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.3.425 · Cited by 48
Statistical power of tests of the situational specificity hypothesis in validity generalization studies: A cautionary note.
Osburn, H. G., Callender, J. C., Greener, J. M., & Ashworth, S. D. (1983) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.68.1.115 · Cited by 48
Self-citation
The validity of validity: An analysis of validation study designs.
Sussmann, M., & Robertson, D. U. (1986) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.71.3.461 · Cited by 45
A META ANALYSIS OF THE VALIDITY OF PREDICTORS OF PERFORMANCE IN LAW SCHOOL
Linn, R. L., & Hastings, C. N. (1984) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1984.tb01032.x · Cited by 43
Moderator Search in Meta-Analysis: A Review and Cautionary Note on Existing Approaches
Viswesvaran, C., & Sánchez, J. I. (1998) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164498058001007 · Cited by 38
The power of the Schmidt and Hunter Additive Model of Validity Generalization.
Kemery, E. R., Mossholder, K. W., & Roth, L. (1987) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.72.1.30 · Cited by 38
VALIDITY GENERALIZATION: A REVIEW AND CRITIQUE OF THE CORRELATION MODEL
Burke, M. J. (1984) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1984.tb02249.x · Cited by 37
Validity Generalization and Situational Specificity: An Analysis of the Prediction of First—Year Grades in Law School
Linn, R. L., Harnisch, D. L., & Dunbar, S. B. (1981) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662168100500301 · Cited by 36
The Proper Sequence for Correcting Correlation Coefficients for Range Restriction and Unreliability
Stauffer, J. M., & Mendoza, J. L. (2001) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02295732 · Cited by 35
Systematic research needs for understanding supervisory-based estimates of SDy in utility analysis
Bobko, P., Karren, R. J., & Kerkar, S. P. (1987) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(87)90006-9 · Cited by 33
Covariance and Regression Slope Models for Studying Validity Generalization
Raju, N. S., Fralicx, R. D., & Steinhaus, S. D. (1986) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662168601000211 · Cited by 33
Multiplicative validity generalization model: Accuracy of estimates as a function of sample size and mean, variance, and shape of distribution of true validities.
Callender, J. C., Osburn, H. G., Greener, J. M., & Ashworth, S. D. (1982) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.67.6.859 · Cited by 32
Self-citation
Progress in validity generalization: Comments on Callender and Osburn and further developments.
Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., & Pearlman, K. (1982) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.67.6.835 · Cited by 31
The realities of employment testing.
Tenopyr, M. L. (1981) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.36.10.1120 · Cited by 30
Unbiased estimation of sampling variance of correlations.
Callender, J. C., & Osburn, H. G. (1988) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.73.2.312 · Cited by 29
Self-citation
Validity generalization: Rejoinder to Schmidt, Hunter, and Raju (1988).
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., Mulaik, S. A., & Mumford, M. D. (1988) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.73.4.673 · Cited by 25
Validity generalization: Some critical remarks on the Schmidt‐Hunter procedure*
ALGERA, J. A., Jansen, P. G. W., Roe, R. A., & Vijn, P. (1984) · Journal of Occupational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1984.tb00162.x · Cited by 25
An empirical Monte Carlo test of the accuracy of the correlation, covariance, and regression slope models for assessing validity generalization.
Raju, N. S., Pappas, S. H., & Williams, C. P. (1989) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.6.901 · Cited by 24
The impact of research synthesis methods on industrial–organizational psychology: The road from pessimism to optimism about cumulative knowledge
DeGeest, D. S., & Schmidt, F. L. (2010) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.22 · Cited by 22
THE EFFECTS OF UNREPRESENTED STUDIES ON THE ROBUSTNESS OF VALIDITY GENERALIZATION RESULTS
Ashworth, S. D., Osburn, H. G., Callender, J. C., & Boyle, K. A. (1992) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1992.tb00853.x · Cited by 23
Self-citation
Reliability of Validity Generalization Data Bases
Whetzel, D. L., & Daniel, M. A. M. (1988) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1988.63.1.131 · Cited by 22
A Logistic Regression Model for Personnel Selection
Raju, N. S., Steinhaus, S. D., EDWARDS, J. E., & DeLessio, J. (1991) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662169101500204 · Cited by 20
Psychometric issues in the assessment of clinical competencies.
Scofield, M. E., & Yoxtheimer, L. L. (1983) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.30.3.413 · Cited by 19
Validity generalization and hypothetical reliability distributions: A test of the Schmidt-Hunter procedure.
Paese, P. W., & Switzer, F. S. (1988) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.73.2.267 · Cited by 18
Validity generalization procedures using sample-based estimates: A comparison of six procedures.
Mendoza, J. L., & Reinhardt, R. N. (1991) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.110.3.596 · Cited by 18
Using Narrow Facets of an Integrity Test to Predict Safety: A test validation study
Casillas, A., Robbins, S. B., McKinniss, T. L., Postlethwaite, B. E., & Oh, I. (2009) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2009.00456.x · Cited by 18
Updating meta-analytic research findings: Bayesian approaches versus the medical model.
Schmidt, F. L., & Raju, N. S. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.297 · Cited by 16
Meta-Analysis of Interrater Reliability of Supervisory Performance Ratings: Effects of Appraisal Purpose, Scale Type, and Range Restriction
Salgado, J. F., & Moscoso, S. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02281 · Cited by 15
Potential Utility Increases From Adding New Tests to the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB).
Schmidt, F. L., Dunn, W. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1995) · doi:10.21236/ada297580 · Cited by 15
A meta-analysis of the validity of the employee attitude inventory theft scales
McDaniel, M. A., & Jones, J. W. (1986) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf01014165 · Cited by 14
History and accuracy of validity generalization equations: A response to the Callender and Osburn reply.
Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Pearlman, K. (1982) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.67.6.853 · Cited by 14
Meta‐Analysis
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2003) · Handbook of Psychology · doi:10.1002/0471264385.wei0221 · Cited by 14
Conducting Meta-Analysis Using the Proc Means Procedure in Sas
Huffcuyt, A. I., Arthur, W., & Bennett, W. R. (1993) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164493053001013 · Cited by 13
THE EFFECT OF CORRELATED ARTIFACTS AND TRUE VALIDITY ON THE ACCURACY OF PARAMETER ESTIMATION IN VALIDITY GENERALIZATION
Raju, N. S., Anselmi, T. V., Goodman, J. S., & Thomas, A. (1998) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1998.tb00733.x · Cited by 12
An empirical comparison of the results of five validity generalization procedures.
Burke, M. J., Raju, N. S., & Pearlman, K. (1986) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.71.2.349 · Cited by 12
Education as Prison Reform: a Meta -Analysis.
Wells, R. E. (2000) · doi:10.31390/gradschool_disstheses.7306 · Cited by 11
Graphological Assessments for Personnel Selection: Concerns and Suggestions for Research
Rafaeli, A., & Drory, A. (1988) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1988.66.3.743 · Cited by 10
ARE WE VALIDATING MORE BUT PUBLISHING LESS? (THE IMPACT OF GOVERNMENTAL REGULATION ON PUBLISHED VALIDATION RESEARCH–AN EXPLORATORY INVESTIGATION)
Boehm, V. R. (1982) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1982.tb02193.x · Cited by 10
Vocational behavior and career development, 1980: A review
Bartol, K. M. (1981) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/0001-8791(81)90055-5 · Cited by 10
TRIFLING HE STANDS
Tenopyr, M. L. (1981) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1981.tb02172.x · Cited by 9
A note on the economic utility of generalized validity coefficients in personnel selection.
Burke, M. J., & Doran, L. I. (1989) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.74.1.171 · Cited by 7
Employee Selection in Times of Change
Viswesvaran, C., & Öneş, D. S. (2010) · Wiley-Blackwell eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470661628.ch5 · Cited by 6
Another view of progress in validity generalization: Reply to Schmidt, Hunter, and Pearlman.
Callender, J. C., & Osburn, H. G. (1982) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.67.6.846 · Cited by 6
Self-citation
Choice of Software and Programs in Meta-Analysis Research: Does it Make a Difference?
Arthur, W., Benneit, W., & Huffcutt, A. I. (1994) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164494054003024 · Cited by 6
When It's Incorrect to Correct: A Brief History and Cautionary Note
DeSimone, J. A. (2014) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1017/s1754942600006829 · Cited by 4
Psychological Testing in Personnel SelectionPreprint
Venne, R. A. (1987) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 4
THE CONTROVERSY OVER PACE: AN EXAMINATION OF THE EVIDENCE AND IMPLICATIONS OF THE LUEVANO CONSENT DECREE FOR EMPLOYMENT TESTING1
Olian, J. D., & WILCOX, J. C. (1982) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1982.tb02217.x · Cited by 4
An Evaluation of James et al.'s (1992) VG Estimation Procedure when Artifacts and True Validity are Correlated*
Thomas, A., & Raju, N. S. (2004) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/j.0965-075x.2004.00285.x · Cited by 3
The Situational Specificity of Validities: Correcting for Statistical Artifacts Does Not Always Reduce the Trans‐Situational Variability of Correlation Coefficients
Murphy, K. R. (1993) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.1993.tb00104.x · Cited by 3
Computer-Assisted Staffing Systems: The Use of Computers in Implementing Meta-Analysis and Utility Research in Personnel Selection
McDaniel, M. A., & Schmidt, F. L. (1989) · Public Personnel Management · doi:10.1177/009102608901800107 · Cited by 2

Authors: Callender, J. C., & Osburn, H. G.
Affiliations: Procter & Gamble (United States) (US)
Venue: Journal of Applied Psychology
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
Published: 1980-10
Volume: 65
Issue: 5
Pages: 543-558
ISSN: 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
1939-1854
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.65.5.543
OpenAlex: W2010337660
Cited by: 112
References: 8
Citations by year: 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI: 14.19
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords: validity generalization, model development, model testing, personnel selection, job performance prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Development and test of a new model for validity generalization.

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks