Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 88Face Recognition and PerceptionMemory Processes and InfluencesFace recognition and analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relationship between accuracy of prior description and facial recognition.

Pigott, Melissa, Brigham, John C.·1985·Journal of Applied Psychology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-9010.70.3.547

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 88

Metadata

Authors
Pigott, M., & Brigham, J. C.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Applied Psychology
Published
1985-08
Volume
70
Issue
3
Pages
547-555
ISSN
  • 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1854
OpenAlex
W1996835618
Cited by
87
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
Keywords
face recognition (cognition), eyewitness identification, face recognition accuracy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.