Construction of a Job in General scale: A comparison of global, composite, and specific measures.

Gail H. Ironson, Patricia C. Smith, Michael Τ. Brannick, Wade M. Gibson·1989·Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract

We describe the construction of a Job in General (JIG) scale, a global scale to accompany the facet scales of the Job Descriptive Index. We applied both traditional and item response theory procedures for item analysis to data from three large heterogeneous samples (N = 1,149, 3,566, and 4,490). Alpha was.91 and above for the resulting 18-item scale in successive samples. Convergent and dis-criminant validity and differential response to treatments were demonstrated. Global scales are con-trasted with composite and with facet scales in psychological measurement. We show that global scales are not equivalent to summated facet scales. Both facet and global scales were useful in another organization (N = 648). Some principles are suggested for choosing specific (facet), composite, or global measures for practical and theoretical problems. The correlations between global and facet scales suggest that work may be the most important facet in relation to general job satisfaction. Researchers have shown much interest in the topic of job sat-isfaction, demonstrated by the large number of articles (esti-mated by Locke, in 1976, at 3,350) written on the subject. It continues to be a major dependent variable in industrial, orga-nizational, and social psychology. The Job Descriptive Index

Cites (2)

  1. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
    Campbell, Donald T., Fiske, Donald W. · 1959 · Psychological Bulletin
  2. Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey.
    Hackman, J. Richard, Oldham, Greg R. · 1975 · Journal of Applied Psychology

Show all 2 references

Cited by (18)

  1. JOB SATISFACTION, ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT, TURNOVER INTENTION, AND TURNOVER: PATH ANALYSES BASED ON META‐ANALYTIC FINDINGS
    TETT, ROBERT P., MEYER, JOHN P. · 1993 · Personnel Psychology
  2. A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires
    Hinkin, Timothy R. · 1998 · Organizational Research Methods
  3. A Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of Organizations
    Hinkin, Timothy R. · 1995 · Journal of Management
  4. CONDUCTING INTERORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH USING KEY INFORMANTS.
    KUMAR, N., STERN, L. W., ANDERSON, J. C. · 1993 · Academy of Management Journal
  5. Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being.
    Steel, Piers, Schmidt, Joseph, Shultz, Jonas · 2008 · Psychological Bulletin

See all 717

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Construction of a Job in General scale: A comparison of global, composite, and specific measures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0021-9010.74.2.193
The paper
Ironson, G. H., Smith, P. C., Brannick, M. Τ., & Gibson, W. M. (1989). Construction of a Job in General scale: A comparison of global, composite, and specific measures. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.74.2.193

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.