Cited by 1,038Psychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth Education and ValidationPsychological Testing and Assessment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predicting the performance of measures in a confirmatory factor analysis with a pretest assessment of their substantive validities.

Anderson, James C., Gerbing, David W.·1991·Journal of Applied Psychology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-9010.76.5.732

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,038

Metadata

Authors
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Portland State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Applied Psychology
Published
1991-10
Volume
76
Issue
5
Pages
732-740
ISSN
  • 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1854
OpenAlex
W2033648667
Cited by
1,038
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 38
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
confirmatory factor analysis, substantive validity, measurement validity, performance prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review