Cited by 100Psychometric Methodologies and TestingCognitive Abilities and TestingPsychological Testing and Assessment

Racial subgroup differences in predictive validity perceptions on personality and cognitive ability tests.

Open access
Chan, David·1997·Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract

The relationships between examinees' racial subgroup membership and their perceptions of the predictive validity of a widely used personality test (NEO Five Factor Inventory; P. T. Costa & R. R. McCrae, 1992) and a widely used cognitive ability test (Wonderlic Personnel Test; E. F. Wonderlic, 1984) were examined. Results from 241 undergraduates showed that Black examinees perceived the cognitive ability test as less valid than White examinees, whereas no significant Black-White difference in predictive validity perceptions was observed on the personality test. Results also indicated a significant but small positive association between performance on the cognitive ability test and predictive validity perceptions of the cognitive ability test. Contrary to predictions, there was little evidence that test performance mediated the relationship between race and predictive validity perceptions on the cognitive ability test. Conversely, predictive validity perceptions did not appear to account for any substantial portion of the racial subgroup differences in test performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.311

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chan, D.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Chan, David
Venue
Journal of Applied Psychology
Published
1997-04
Volume
82
Issue
2
Pages
311-320
ISSN
  • 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1854
OpenAlex
W2077841474
Cited by
100
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
personality tests, cognitive ability tests, NEO-FFI, Wonderlic Personnel Test, black-white disparities, test performance, racial bias in testing
MeSH terms
Adult, Aptitude Tests, Black or African American, Female, Humans, Individuality, Male, Personality Inventory, Personnel Selection, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review