The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Charting the Language of Leadership: A Methodological Investigation of President Bush and the Crisis of 9/11.
Abstract
In many ways, leadership is a phenomenon that is ideally suited for new and inventive research methods. For researchers who seek to reliably study and systematically compare linguistically based elements of the leadership relationship, computerized content analysis has the potential to supplement, extend, and qualify existing leadership theory and practice. Through an examination of President Bush's rhetoric and the media coverage before and after the crisis of 9/11. the authors explore how elements of the President's speeches changed in response to the post-crisis environment. Using this example, the authors illustrate the process of computerized content analysis and many of its strengths and limitations, with the hope of facilitating future leadership research that uses this approach to explore important contextual and symbolic elements of the leadership relationship.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Content Analysis Guidebook
Neuendorf, K. A. (2017) · doi:10.4135/9781071802878 · Cited by 9,286 · cited 1×
“Other programs (eg, LIWC, TextSmart, CATPAC, and Wordstat) are readily available and too numerous to list exhaustively (see Neuendorf, 2002, and West, 2001, for useful resources).”
BackgroundEmotions and leadership: The role of emotional intelligence
George, J. M. (2000) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726700538001 · Cited by 2,027
Cited by
Duriau, V. J., Reger, R. K., & Pfarrer, M. D. (2007) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428106289252 · Cited by 1,544
Followership theory: A review and research agenda
Uhl-Bien, M., Riggio, R. E., Lowe, K. B., & Carsten, M. K. (2014) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.007 · Cited by 1,213
The language of US corporate environmental disclosure
Cho, C. H., Roberts, R. W., & Patten, D. M. (2010) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2009.10.002 · Cited by 836
Short, J. C., Broberg, J. C., Cogliser, C. C., & Brigham, K. H. (2010) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428109335949 · Cited by 644
Making sense of text: artificial intelligence-enabled content analysis
Lee, L. W., Dabirian, A., McCarthy, I. P., & Kietzmann, J. (2020) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-02-2019-0219 · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Bligh, M. C., Kohles, J. C., & Meindl, J. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 562-574
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W2068721891
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 47.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Charting the Language of Leadership: A Methodological Investigation of President Bush and the Crisis of 9/11. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.562
- The paper
- Bligh, M. C., Kohles, J. C., & Meindl, J. R. (2004). Charting the Language of Leadership: A Methodological Investigation of President Bush and the Crisis of 9/11. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.562
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
