The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of Task Autonomy on Performance: An Extended Model Considering Motivational, Informational, and Structural Mechanisms.
Abstract
A model explaining the relationship between task autonomy and performance is proposed that incorporates 3 different causal mechanisms. The performance benefits of task autonomy may be realized by increased motivation (motivational mechanisms), by capitalization of information asymmetries (informational mechanisms), or by better alignment with task and organizational structures (structural mechanisms). Further, it is proposed that these performance benefits are moderated by a variety of variables ranging from individual traits to organizational design. This model may provide a means for accounting for the sometimes inconsistent findings in the empirical literature exploring the relationship between autonomy and performance. The model also offers guidance in the search for additional boundary conditions as well as prescriptive guidelines for the allocation of autonomy in practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835
The Darker and Brighter Sides of Human Existence: Basic Psychological Needs as a Unifying Concept
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1104_03 · Cited by 1,344
Cited by
The job perception inventory: Considering human factors and needs in the design of human-AI work
Berretta, S., Tausch, A., Peifer, C., & Kluge, A. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1128945 · Cited by 35
“Autonomy Motivation (Dysvik and Kuvaas, 2011), performance (Langfred and Moye, 2004), creativity (d’Inverno and Luck, 2012), and proactivity (Kim et al.”
BackgroundTian, X., & Chae, H. (2023) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs13020180 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Langfred, C. W., & Moye, N. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 934-945
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W1997118553
- Cited by
- 431
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
