Cited by 35Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorAI and HR TechnologiesTechnostress in Professional Settings

The job perception inventory: Considering human factors and needs in the design of human-AI work

Open access
Berretta, Sophie, Tausch, Alina, Peifer, Corinna, Kluge, Annette·2023·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) is seen as a driver of change, especially in the context of business, due to its progressive development and increasing connectivity in operational practice. Although it changes businesses and organizations vastly, the impact of AI implementation on human workers with their needs, skills, and job identity is less considered in the development and implementation process. Focusing on humans, however, enables unlocking synergies as well as desirable individual and organizational outcomes. Methods: The objective of the present study is (a) to develop a survey-based inventory from the literature on work research and b) a first validation with employees encountering an AI application. The Job Perception Inventory (JOPI) functions as a work-analytical tool to support the human-centered implementation and application of intelligent technologies. It is composed of established and self-developed scales, measuring four sections of work characteristics, job identity, perception of the workplace, and the evaluation of the introduced AI. Results: Overall, the results from the first study from a series of studies presented in this article indicate a coherent survey inventory with reliable scales that can now be used for AI implementation projects. Discussion: Finally, the need and relevance of the JOPI are discussed against the background of the manufacturing industry.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1128945

Cites

175 of 175 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 178 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Ajzen I. Fishbein M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour. Prentice Hall.
  2. Bauer W. Klapper J. (2019). “A development scenario of the work area “intralogistics” under the influence of industry 4.0 technologies and its evaluation on the basis of a Delphi Study,” in Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018), Vol. 825, eds S. Bagnara, R. Tartaglia, S. Albolino, T. Alexander, and Y. Fujita (Florence: Springer International Publishing), 812– 821.
  3. Baya'a N. Daher W. Jaber O. Anabousy A. (2018). “Educating pre-service teachers in metacognitive activities,” in Fifth ERME Topic Conference, eds H.-G. Weigland, A. Clark-Wilson, A. Donevska-Todorova, E. Faggiano, N. Grønbæk, and J. Trgalova (Copenhagen).
  4. Brünken R. Seufert T. Paas F. (2012). “Measuring cognitive load,” in Cognitive Load Theory, eds J. L. Plass, R. Moreno, and R. Brünken (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press), 181– 202.
  5. Dubey A. Abhinav K. Jain S. Arora V. Puttaveerana A. (2020). “HACO: a framework for developing human-AI teaming,” in Proceedings of the 13th Innovations in Software Engineering Conference on Formerly known as India Software Engineering Conference, eds S. Jain, A. Gupta, D. Lo, D. Saha, and R. Sharma (India: ACM), 1– 9.
  6. Egbert D. (2020). There's an App for That - A Multi-methodological View on the Evaluation and Utilization of Mobile Applications [Dissertation]. Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Aachen.
  7. Endacott C. G. (2021). The Work of Identity Construction in the Age of Intelligent Machines [Dissertation]. University of California, Santa Barbara.
  8. IEEE (2019). Ethically Aligned Design. IEEE. Available online at: https://standards.ieee.org/content/dam/ieee-standards/standards/web/documents/other/ead1e.pdf (accessed September 30, 2022).
  9. Ötting S. K. (2020). Artificial Intelligence as Colleague and Supervisor: Successful and Fair Interactions Between Intelligent Technologies and Employees at Work [Dissertation]. Bielefeld University, Bielefeld.
  10. Sundararajan A. (2016). The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism. The MIT Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berretta, S., Tausch, A., Peifer, C., & Kluge, A.
Affiliations
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
  • University of Lübeck (DE)
Corresponding author
Berretta, Sophie
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2023-05-23
Volume
14
Pages
1128945-1128945
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4378085445
Cited by
35
References
178
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2
FWCI
10.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (02L19C200)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Technostress in Professional Settings
Keywords
AI implementation, human-centered AI, occupational identity, job characteristics, workplace perceptions, employee perceptions of AI, scale development, manufacturing industry, human factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review