The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
"Not Another Meeting!" Are Meeting Time Demands Related to Employee Well-Being?
Abstract
Using an interruptions framework, this article proposes and tests a set of hypotheses concerning the relationship of meeting time demands with job attitudes and well-being (JAWB). Two Internet surveys were administered to employees who worked 35 hr or more per week. Study 1 examined prescheduled meetings attended in a typical week (N=676), whereas Study 2 investigated prescheduled meetings attended during the current day (N=304). As proposed, the relationship between meeting time demands and JAWB was moderated by task interdependence, meeting experience quality, and accomplishment striving. However, results were somewhat dependent on the time frame of a study and the operational definition used for meeting time demands. Furthermore, perceived meeting effectiveness was found to have a strong, direct relationship with JAWB.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The measurement of well-being and other aspects of mental health.
Warr, P. (1990) · Journal of Occupational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00521.x · Cited by 1,490 · cited 2×
“Although significantly intercorrelated, the two forms of well-being are differentially related to several organizational features (e.g., Warr, 1990 ).”
BackgroundSelf-citationWhat makes interruptions disruptive? A study of length, similarity, and complexity
Gillie, T., & Broadbent, D. (1989) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/bf00309260 · Cited by 490
Cited by
Olguin, D. O., Waber, B. N., Kim, T., Mohan, A., Ara, K., & Pentland, A. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics) · doi:10.1109/tsmcb.2008.2006638 · Cited by 420
Virtual Work Meetings during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Good, Bad, and Ugly
Karl, K. A., Peluchette, J. V., & Aghakhani, N. (2022) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/10464964211015286 · Cited by 375
Collaborating During Coronavirus: The Impact of COVID-19 on the Nature of Work
DeFilippis, E., Impink, S. M., Singell, M., Polzer, J., & Sadun, R. (2020) · doi:10.3386/w27612 · Cited by 273
Something(s) old and something(s) new: Modeling drivers of global virtual team effectiveness
Maynard, M. T., Mathieu, J. E., Rapp, T. L., & Gilson, L. L. (2012) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.1772 · Cited by 225
The daily stand-up meeting: A grounded theory study
Stray, V., Sjøberg, D. I. K., & Dybå, T. (2016) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2016.01.004 · Cited by 139
Metadata
- Authors
- Rogelberg, S. G., Leach, D. J., Warr, P. B., & Burnfield, J. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 83-96
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W2105702240
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: "Not Another Meeting!" Are Meeting Time Demands Related to Employee Well-Being? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.83
- The paper
- Rogelberg, S. G., Leach, D. J., Warr, P. B., & Burnfield, J. L. (2006). "Not Another Meeting!" Are Meeting Time Demands Related to Employee Well-Being? Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.83
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
