The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Perceptions of organizational change: A stress and coping perspective.
Abstract
Few organizational change studies identify the aspects of change that are salient to individuals and that influence well-being. The authors identified three distinct change characteristics: the frequency, impact and planning of change. R. S. Lazarus and S. Folkman's (1984) cognitive phenomenological model of stress and coping was used to propose ways that these change characteristics influence individuals' appraisal of the uncertainty associated with change, and, ultimately, job satisfaction and turnover intentions. Results of a repeated cross-sectional study that collected individuals' perceptions of change one month prior to employee attitudes in consecutive years indicated that while the three change perceptions were moderately to strongly intercorrelated, the change perceptions displayed differential relationships with outcomes. Discussion focuses on the importance of systematically considering individuals' subjective experience of change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
“Stress: appraisal and coping,”
Folkman, S. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215 · Cited by 27,833
THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
BARRICK, M. R., & MOUNT, M. K. (1991) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x · Cited by 8,689
A Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of Organizations
Hinkin, T. R. (1995) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639502100509 · Cited by 3,193
Longitudinal Field Research Methods for Studying Processes of Organizational Change
van de Ven, A. H., & Huber, G. P. (1990) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1.3.213 · Cited by 832 · cited 1×
“Other authors have argued that individuals are concerned with the timing of change in the workplace, and make judgments about whether change occurs very frequently or infrequently (Glick, Huber, Miller, Harold, & Sutcliffe, 1995; Monge, 1995).”
Background
Cited by
Owens, B. P., & Hekman, D. R. (2012) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0441 · Cited by 778
Change Readiness: A Multilevel Review
Rafferty, A. E., Jimmieson, N. L., & Armenakis, A. A. (2013) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206312457417 · Cited by 679
Self-citationEhrhart, M. G., Aarons, G. A., & Farahnak, L. R. (2014) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-014-0157-1 · Cited by 502
Organizational Change Recipients' Beliefs Scale: Development of an Assessment Instrument
Armenakis, A. A., Bernerth, J. B., Pitts, J. P., & Walker, H. J. (2007) · The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science · doi:10.1177/0021886307303654 · Cited by 386
Cullen, K. L., Edwards, B. D., Casper, W. C., & Gue, K. R. (2014) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-013-9312-y · Cited by 377
Metadata
- Authors
- Rafferty, A. E., & Griffin, M. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1154-1162
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W2075965524
- Cited by
- 715
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 23.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perceptions of organizational change: A stress and coping perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1154
- The paper
- Rafferty, A. E., & Griffin, M. A. (2006). Perceptions of organizational change: A stress and coping perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1154
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
