The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dispositional resistance to change: Measurement equivalence and the link to personal values across 17 nations.
Open accessAbstract
The concept of dispositional resistance to change has been introduced in a series of exploratory and confirmatory analyses through which the validity of the Resistance to Change (RTC) Scale has been established (S. Oreg, 2003). However, the vast majority of participants with whom the scale was validated were from the United States. The purpose of the present work was to examine the meaningfulness of the construct and the validity of the scale across nations. Measurement equivalence analyses of data from 17 countries, representing 13 languages and 4 continents, confirmed the cross-national validity of the scale. Equivalent patterns of relationships between personal values and RTC across samples extend the nomological net of the construct and provide further evidence that dispositional resistance to change holds equivalent meanings across nations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0902_5 · Cited by 16,280
Schwartz, S. H. (1992) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60281-6 · Cited by 14,619
Measurement Invariance, Factor Analysis and Factorial Invariance
Meredith, W. (1993) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294825 · Cited by 4,536
Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.105.3.456 · Cited by 4,115
Cited by
Career Adapt-Abilities Scale–Short Form (CAAS-SF): Construction and Validation
Maggiori, C., Rossier, J., & Savickas, M. L. (2017) · Journal of Career Assessment · doi:10.1177/1069072714565856 · Cited by 300
Heidenreich, S., & Handrich, M. (2015) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12161 · Cited by 292
Kandler, C., Bleidorn, W., & Riemann, R. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0025560 · Cited by 254
Are digital natives open to change? Examining flexible thinking and resistance to change
Barak, M. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.016 · Cited by 157
Katz-Gerro, T., Greenspan, I., Handy, F., & Lee, H.-Y. (2017) · Environmental Values · doi:10.3197/096327117x14847335385599 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- Oreg, S., Bayazit, M., Vakola, M., Arciniega, L., Armenakis, A., Barkauskiene, R., Bozionelos, N., Fujimoto, Y., González, L., Han, J., Hřebíčková, M., Jimmieson, N., Kordačová, J., Mitsuhashi, H., Mlačić, B., Ferić, I., Topić, M. K., Ohly, S., Saksvik, P. Ø., Hetland, H., Saksvik, I., & van Dam, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 935-944
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W2170717892
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 13.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dispositional resistance to change: Measurement equivalence and the link to personal values across 17 nations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.935
- The paper
- Oreg, S., Bayazit, M., Vakola, M., Arciniega, L., Armenakis, A., Barkauskiene, R., Bozionelos, N., Fujimoto, Y., González, L., Han, J., Hřebíčková, M., Jimmieson, N., Kordačová, J., Mitsuhashi, H., Mlačić, B., Ferić, I., Topić, M. K., Ohly, S., Saksvik, P. Ø., . . . van Dam, K. (2008). Dispositional resistance to change: Measurement equivalence and the link to personal values across 17 nations. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.935
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
