The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ill-structured measurement designs in organizational research: Implications for estimating interrater reliability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Instead, the interrater reliability for Ill-Structured Measurement Designs of Putka et al. (2008) was used”
From A time-scale modification dataset with subjective quality labels (2020) · cites this paper as Putka et al. (2008)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
Measurement error in psychological research: Lessons from 26 research scenarios.
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1996) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.1.2.199 · Cited by 567
Cited by
Obtaining Unbiased Results in Meta-Analysis: The Importance of Correcting for Statistical Artifacts
Wiernik, B. M., & Dahlke, J. A. (2020) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2515245919885611 · Cited by 135
Conklin, L. R., & Strunk, D. R. (2015) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2015.06.011 · Cited by 59
Interrater reliability for multilevel data: A generalizability theory approach.
ten Hove, D., Jorgensen, T. D., & van der Ark, L. A. (2022) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000391 · Cited by 22
A time-scale modification dataset with subjective quality labels
Roberts, T., & Paliwal, K. K. (2020) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0001567 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Putka, D. J., Le, H., McCloy, R. A., & Diaz, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 959-981
- ISSN
- 1939-1854
- 0021-9010
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Human Resources Research Organization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ill-structured measurement designs in organizational research: Implications for estimating interrater reliability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.959
- The paper
- Putka, D. J., Le, H., McCloy, R. A., & Diaz, T. (2008). Ill-structured measurement designs in organizational research: Implications for estimating interrater reliability. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.959
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
