The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Factor-analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Given that the longest scale in the present study consists of 20 items (SOCS-S/SOCS-O), a minimum sample of 200 participants is required.”
From Validation of the compassionate engagement and action scales, compassion scale, and Sussex-Oxford compassion scales in a French-Canadian sample (2024) · cites this paper as [73]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development.
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309 · Cited by 6,567
Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149 · Cited by 5,925
Bagby, R. M., Parker, J. D. A., & Taylor, G. J. (1994) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(94)90005-1 · Cited by 5,293
The meaning in life questionnaire: assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life
Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.80 · Cited by 4,843
Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments.
Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.286 · Cited by 3,970
Metadata
- Authors
- Comrey, A. L.
- Corresponding author
- Comrey, Andrew L.
- Venue
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- Published
- 1988
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 754-761
- ISSN
- 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2117
- OpenAlex
- W4240922193
- Cited by
- 1,154
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 30
- FWCI
- 14.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- factor analysis, scale development, personality assessment, clinical psychology, psychometric scale
- MeSH terms
- Factor Analysis, Statistical, Humans, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
