Cited by 3,970Psychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Testing and AssessmentHealth Education and Validation

Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments.

Floyd, Frank J., Widaman, Keith F.·1995·Psychological Assessment

Abstract

The goals of both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis are described and procedural guidelines for each approach are summarized, emphasizing the use of factor analysis in developing and refining clinical measures. For exploratory factor analysis, a rationale is presented for selecting between principal components analysis and common factor analysis depending on whether the research goal involves either identification of latent constructs or data reduction. Confirmatory factor analysis using structural equation modeling is described for use in validating the dimensional structure of a measure. Additionally, the uses of confirmatory factor analysis for assessing the invariance of measures across samples and for evaluating multitrait-multimethod data are also briefly described. Suggestions are offered for handling common problems with item-level data, and examples illustrating potential difficulties with confirming dimensional structures from initial exploratory analyses are reviewed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.286

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Psychological Assessment
Published
1995-09
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
286-299
ISSN
  • 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-134X
OpenAlex
W2039173306
Cited by
3,970
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 97 · 2025: 164 · 2024: 184 · 2023: 168 · 2022: 193 · 2021: 179 · 2020: 173 · 2019: 166 · 2018: 192 · 2017: 208 · 2016: 180 · 2015: 194 · 2014: 203 · 2013: 201 · 2012: 189
FWCI
31.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
factor analysis, clinical assessment tools, instrument development, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, principal component analysis, common factor analysis, structural equation modeling, dimensional structure, measurement invariance, latent constructs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review