The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of eventual suicide in psychiatric inpatients by clinical ratings of hopelessness
Abstract
A 9-point clinical rating scale was used to assess the severity of hopelessness in 141 patients hospitalized with suicidal ideation. The patients were followed from 5 to 10 years, and 10 (7.1%) eventually committed suicide. The mean hopelessness rating for the patients committing suicide was significantly higher than that for the patients not committing suicide. A cutoff score of 6 or above successfully predicted 9 (90.0%) of those committing suicide. The results supported previous findings in which self-reported hopelessness on the Beck Hopelessness Scale was reported to predict suicide in both psychiatric outpatients and inpatients.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Several international studies reported good psychometric properties of the BHS and suggested satisfactory ability in predicting subsequent suicide behavior, and general health and social functioning [30–34].”
From High depression symptomatology and mental pain characterize suicidal psychiatric patients (2022) · cites this paper as [33]
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The interpersonal theory of suicide.
Van Orden, K. A., Witte, T. K., Cukrowicz, K. C., Braithwaite, S. R., Selby, E. A., & Joiner, T. E. (2010) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0018697 · Cited by 5,292
Risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: A meta-analysis of 50 years of research
Franklin, J. C., Ribeiro, J. D., Fox, K. R., Bentley, K. H., Kleiman, E. M., Huang, X., Musacchio, K. M., Jaroszewski, A. C., Chang, B. P., & Nock, M. K. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000084 · Cited by 3,784
Suicide, Suicide Attempts, and Suicidal Ideation
Klonsky, E. D., May, A. M., & Saffer, B. Y. (2016) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093204 · Cited by 1,675
Kleiman, E. M., Turner, B. J., Fedor, S., Beale, E. E., Huffman, J. C., & Nock, M. K. (2017) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/abn0000273 · Cited by 831
Brezo, J., Paris, J., & Turecki, G. (2006) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00702.x · Cited by 647
“Finally, hopelessness was greater in completers in several long-term prospective studies involving hospitalized ideators (210, 211) and psychiatric outpatients (212).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Beck, A. T., Brown, G., & Steer, R. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- Published
- 1989
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 309-310
- ISSN
- 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2117
- OpenAlex
- W2020204240
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 8.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Keywords
- suicide risk prediction, hopelessness, suicidal ideation, psychiatric inpatients, Beck Hopelessness Scale, clinical rating scales, suicide risk assessment, long-term follow-up, cut-off values
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Depressive Disorder, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Motivation, Psychiatric Department, Hospital, Psychological Tests, Psychometrics, Risk Factors, Suicide
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review