Cited by 301Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchCounseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics

Comparing the process in psychodynamic and cognitive-behavioral therapies.

Jones, Enrico E., Pulos, Steven M.·1993·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Archival records were used to compare the therapy process in 30 brief psychodynamic and 32 cognitive-behavioral therapies. Verbatim transcripts of 186 treatment sessions were rated with the Psychotherapy Process Q-set, designed to provide a standard language for the description of process. Results demonstrated that although some features were common to both treatments, there were important differences. Cognitive-behavioral therapy promoted control of negative affect through the use of intellect and rationality combined with vigorous encouragement, support, and reassurance from therapists. In psychodynamic psychotherapies, there was an emphasis on the evocation of affect, on bringing troublesome feelings into awareness, and on integrating current difficulties with previous life experience, using the therapist-patient relationship as a change agent. The clinical theoretical precepts underlying psychodynamic treatments received considerable support. In cognitive-behavioral therapies, there was evidence for the importance of developmental, as opposed to rationalist, intervention strategies for treatment outcome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.61.2.306

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Combining psychoanalytic techniques with cognitive therapy enhances treatment outcomes, whereas cognitive techniques alone have limited association with long-term improvements.

    “Research indicates that combining psychoanalytic techniques with cognitive therapy enhances treatment outcomes, whereas cognitive techniques alone demonstrate limited association with long-term improvements (123).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, E. E., & Pulos, S. M.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
1993
Volume
61
Issue
2
Pages
306-316
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2011642517
Cited by
301
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
FWCI
3.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh038348-06)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH 38348)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
Keywords
psychodynamic psychotherapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, therapeutic process, Psychotherapy Process Q-Set, brief psychotherapy, emotional awareness, therapeutic relationship
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Psychoanalytic Therapy, Psychotherapy, Brief, Q-Sort, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review