Cited by 244Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

A controlled trial of cue exposure treatment in alcohol dependence

Drummond, D. Colin, Glautier, Steven·1994·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

The clinical effectiveness of cue exposure (CE) treatment in alcohol dependence was evaluated in a controlled trial. Thirty-five men who were detoxified and severely alcohol dependent received either CE or relaxation control (RC) treatment. CE Ss had 400 min exposure to the sight and smell of preferred drinks over 10 days in a laboratory setting. RC Ss spent identical time in the laboratory but had relaxation therapy and only 20 min exposure to alcohol cues. During 6-month follow-up, personal interview was achieved with 91% of Ss. CE Ss had a more favorable outcome than the RC Ss in terms of latency (length of time) to relapse of heavy drinking (p < .01) and total alcohol consumption (p < .05). Significant predictors of latency to heavy drinking and dependence included skin conductance level (p < .001) and experimental condition (p < .01). Results point to the potential importance of cue exposure as a treatment for addictive behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.62.4.809

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Contextual, especially emotional, cues are important in triggering maladaptive behavioral responses such as substance use.

    “the importance of contextual (in particular, emotional) cues in triggering maladaptive behavioral responses such as substance use”

    From Initial RCT of a distress tolerance treatment for individuals with substance use disorders (2012) · cites this paper as Drummond and Glautier, 1994

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 35 · Cited by 244

Authors
Drummond, D. C., & Glautier, S.
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
1994-08
Volume
62
Issue
4
Pages
809-817
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2127822020
Cited by
244
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
cue exposure therapy, alcoholism, alcohol relapse, heavy drinking, relaxation training, skin conductance, alcohol cues, addiction treatment, alcohol detoxification
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcoholism, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Inactivation, Metabolic, Relaxation Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review