Cited by 211Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Initial RCT of a distress tolerance treatment for individuals with substance use disorders

Open access
Bornovalova, Marina A., Gratz, Kim L., Daughters, Stacey B., Hunt, Elizabeth D., Lejuez, C.W.·2012·Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Abstract

Background: Psychological distress tolerance, the ability to persist in goal directed activity when experiencing psychological distress, is associated with poor substance use treatment outcomes including drug and alcohol treatment dropout and relapse. Objective: The current study examines if a brief distress tolerance intervention that was specifically developed as an adjunctive treatment for patients in residential substance abuse treatment shows efficacy in improving the patients' distress tolerance. Methods: Seventy-six individuals who were receiving treatment at a residential substance use treatment facility and indexed low distress tolerance on laboratory distress tolerance measures were randomized into three conditions: treatment-as-usual (TAU), six sessions of Supportive Counseling (SC), or six sessions of the novel distress tolerance treatment, Skills for Improving Distress Intolerance (SIDI). Measures: Patients were assessed at baseline for DSM-IV psychiatric diagnoses, DSM-IV substance use disorders, distress tolerance, and depressive symptoms. Patients were again assessed at posttreatment. Therapeutic alliance and treatment expectancies and credibility were also assessed at posttreatment. Results: Patients who received SIDI (n=28) evidenced significantly greater improvements than SC (n=24) and TAU participants (n=24) on the distress tolerance laboratory measures, even when controlling for changes in negative affect (in the form of depression). Additionally, a higher percentage of patients in SIDI reached clinically significant improvement compared to patients in SC and TAU. Conclusion: This study supports the efficacy of SIDI in improving distress tolerance levels among individuals with drug and alcohol use disorders currently receiving residential substance use treatment. SIDI appears to be a brief and feasible intervention for use within inpatient substance use facilities. © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.09.012

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

9 of 48 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Findingown data

    In the SIDI condition, participants showed significantly greater improvements in distress tolerance than those in the SC and TAU conditions.

    “patients in the SIDI condition evidenced significantly greater improvements in distress tolerance than those in the SC [F(1) = 10.77; p < .001; d =1.00] and TAU [F(1) = 3.99; p < .05, d =.60] conditions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    SIDI participants had higher rates of borderline personality disorder than SC participants.

    “as well as higher rates of borderline personality disorder than participants in SC (χ2(1) = 9.67, φ = .44; p < .01).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Negative affect increased in response to both the MTPT and PASAT tasks at baseline and posttreatment.

    “results of a series of paired t-tests performed on pre- and post-task negative affect ratings revealed an increase in negative affect in response to both tasks at both baseline and posttreatment”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    A higher percentage of SIDI patients reached clinically significant improvement compared to SC and TAU patients.

    “Additionally, a higher percentage of patients in SIDI reached clinically significant improvement compared to patients in SC and TAU”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Task performance indices showed no significant association with distress tolerance on either task at either time point.

    “indices of task performance were not significantly associated with distress tolerance on either task at either time point (rs < −.10 to +.08, ps > .50)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 29
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 17
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Distress intolerance on these tasks is heightened among SUD patients with borderline personality, antisocial personality, and posttraumatic stress disorders, and predicts treatment dropout among substance users in residential treatment.

    “distress intolerance on these tasks has been found to be heightened among SUD patients with borderline personality, antisocial personality, and posttraumatic stress disorders, (Bornovalova et al., 2008; Bornovalova et al., 2011; Daughters et al., 2008) and to predict treatment dropout among substance users in residential treatment”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bornovalova et al., 2008 source
    • cites Bornovalova et al., 2011 source

      The Current Study’s Preliminary Univariate Analyses (page unavailable) found no significant association between task-measured distress tolerance and borderline personality scores (β = −.10, p = .20). The Discussion likewise says distress tolerance was not associated with BPD at a univariate level, contrary to the cited claim that intolerance was heightened among patients with BPD. The citation is attached to the disorder clause, not the subsequent treatment-dropout clause. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Daughters et al., 2008 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Neither emotional distress in response to the tasks nor task performance is significantly associated with latency to task termination.

    “neither emotional distress in response to the tasks nor task performance have been found to be significantly associated with latency to task termination”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bornovalova et al., 2008 source
    • cites Daughters et al., 2008 source

      The Results section (Descriptives Across the Entire Sample; page unavailable) reports no significant correlation between task persistence and self-reported dysphoria measured before or after the task. The Method section describes task performance and termination latency, but the passages found do not report a statistical association between them. The task-performance part of the claim is therefore unsupported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Gratz et al., 2007 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Distress intolerance is strongly associated with substance use coping motives, substance use frequency, and substance use disorders.

    “distress intolerance is robustly associated with substance use coping motives, as well as substance use frequency and substance use disorders (SUDs)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Buckner et al., 2007 source
    • cites Howell et al., 2010 source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that distress tolerance was uniquely related to coping motives for alcohol use among young adult drinkers. It does not establish the claimed association with substance-use frequency, and it reports no incremental association between distress tolerance and alcohol-use problems. The study addresses alcohol-use problems, not substance use disorders broadly. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Marshall-Berenz et al., 2011 source

      The Results (Zero-Order Correlations; page not provided) report a significant association between lower distress tolerance and stronger alcohol-use coping motives (r = -.46). They report no significant association between distress tolerance and alcohol consumption or AUDIT alcohol-problem scores. The paper lists substance use disorder diagnoses but does not establish the claimed association with those diagnoses. (LLM, conf=0.89)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Findings suggest that SIDI may be portable and generalizable, and may have utility for various psychological difficulties and maladaptive behaviors thought to stem from distress intolerance.

    “findings that SIDI targets distress tolerance directly (and effectively) suggest the potential portability and generalizability of this treatment, highlighting its potential utility for a variety of psychological difficulties and maladaptive behaviors thought to stem from distress intolerance”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bornovalova et al., 2008 source
    • cites Daughters et al., 2008 source

      The Discussion links distress tolerance to ASPD and BPD and suggests that interventions addressing emotional discomfort may help with maladaptive behaviors. It does not discuss SIDI, test whether SIDI improves distress tolerance, or assess the treatment’s portability or generalizability. The broader rationale has some support, but the SIDI-specific claim does not. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Daughters et al., 2009 source

      The Introduction (§1.2) links low distress tolerance with several psychological difficulties and maladaptive behaviors. The Discussion (§4) suggests that these links could inform targeted treatments for youth. The paper does not study SIDI or establish that it effectively targets distress tolerance, is portable, or is generalizable. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    A variety of psychological difficulties and maladaptive behaviors are thought to stem from distress intolerance.

    “a variety of psychological difficulties and maladaptive behaviors thought to stem from distress intolerance (e.g., Bornovalova et al., 2008; Daughters et al., 2008; Daughters et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bornovalova et al., 2008 source
    • cites Daughters et al., 2008 source
    • cites Daughters et al., 2009 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    SIDI and SC did not differ on therapeutic alliance, treatment expectancy, or treatment credibility.

    “Importantly, SIDI and SC did not differ on therapeutic alliance [F(1)= .33; p =.57; d =.17], treatment expectancy [F(1) = .52; p =.48; d =.20], or treatment credibility [F(1)= .51; p =.48; d =.20].”
    • Also stated in: § 3.2. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics between Conditions · plain
      “SIDI and SC did not differ on therapeutic alliance [F(1)= .33; p =.57; d =.17], treatment expectancy [F(1) = .52; p =.48; d =.20], or treatment credibility [F(1)= .51; p =.48; d =.20].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Treatment groups did not differ significantly on any demographic, psychopathology, treatment history, or court status variable, with two exceptions: anxiety and borderline personality disorders.

    “Treatment groups did not differ significantly on any demographic, psychopathology, treatment history, or court status variable, with two exceptions”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    SIDI participants showed significant reductions in depression and significant improvements in distress tolerance from pre- to post-treatment.

    “patients in SIDI evidenced significant reductions in depression and significant improvements in distress tolerance from pre- to post-treatment”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The rate of clinically significant improvement in distress tolerance was significantly higher in SIDI than in SC, but not significantly higher than in TAU.

    “the rate of improvement in distress tolerance in the SIDI condition significantly higher than in the SC condition [χ2(2) = 11.64, p <.01], but not the TAU condition [χ(2) = 3.02, p = .22].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    SC participants showed significant improvements only in depression and significant decreases in distress tolerance from baseline to posttreatment.

    “those in SC reported significant improvements only in depression (and actually evidenced significant decreases in distress tolerance from baseline to posttreatment).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The two distress tolerance tasks were significantly correlated at baseline (r = .34) and post-treatment (r = .57).

    “Given the significant correlations between the two tasks at baseline (r = .34, p < .001) and post-treatment (r = .57, p <.001), a composite score was created”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    TAU participants did not show significant change on either depression or distress tolerance.

    “Individuals in TAU failed to show significant change on either of the outcome variables.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    SIDI participants had higher rates of both anxiety and borderline personality disorders than TAU participants.

    “participants in the SIDI condition had higher rates of both anxiety and borderline personality disorders than participants in TAU [χ2(1)s = 9.07 and 7.17, and φs = .43 and .38, respectively; ps < .01)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There was no significant group by time interaction for CES-D scores, indicating that improvement in depression symptoms was comparable across the three groups.

    “A repeated-measures ANCOVA (controlling for borderline personality and anxiety disorders) revealed no significant group X time interactions for CES-D scores, suggesting that improvement in depression symptoms was comparable across the three groups”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    SIDI participants reported slightly higher rates of anxiety disorders than SC participants, but this difference did not reach significance.

    “Although SIDI participants also reported slightly higher rates of anxiety disorders than SC participants, this effect did not reach significance (χ2(1) = 3.42, φ = .26, p = .064).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    SC participants did not differ significantly from TAU participants in rates of either anxiety or borderline personality disorder.

    “SC participants did not differ significantly from TAU participants in rates of either disorder (χ2(1)s < 1.57, φs < .19, ps > .30].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The inclusion of the supportive counseling comparison condition controlled for nonspecific treatment effects of contact time and client-therapist alliance.

    “The inclusion of the SC comparison condition allowed us to control for the nonspecific treatment effects of contact time and client-therapist alliance”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The CALPAS and CEQ were administered to control for nonspecific therapeutic factors.

    “To control for nonspecific therapeutic factors, participants in the SIDI and SC conditions completed the California Psychotherapy Alliance Scale (CALPAS) and the Treatment Expectancy and Credibility Scales (CEQ)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Devilly and Borkovec, 2000 source
    • cites Gaston, 1991 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Participants were recruited 2-5 days after residential treatment entry to limit the influence of remaining withdrawal symptoms on performance.

    “To limit the potential influence of any remaining withdrawal symptoms on performance (expected to be minimal given the requirement of detoxification prior to entering this treatment facility), participants were recruited into the study between 2–5 days from residential treatment entry”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Remaining withdrawal symptoms are minimal and do not affect distress tolerance task performance.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) specifically targets distress tolerance and has been found efficacious for co-occurring borderline personality disorder and substance use disorders.

    “Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT; Linehan, 1993) specifically targets distress tolerance and has been found to be efficacious in the treatment of co-occurring borderline personality disorder and SUDs”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Linehan, 1993 source
    • cites Linehan et al., 2002 source
    • cites Linehan et al., 1999 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Brown et al. (2008) did not examine changes in distress tolerance, so it remains unclear whether their treatment improves distress tolerance.

    “the authors did not actually examine changes in distress tolerance over the course of this open trial. Thus, it remains unclear if this treatment actually improves distress tolerance as theorized”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brown et al. (2008) source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The CES-D was administered to ensure that any effects of SIDI on distress tolerance were not due to changes in negative affect.

    “To ensure that any effects of SIDI on distress tolerance are not due to decreases in patients’ overall distress or general negative affect, the 9-item Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale was administered”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Martensa et al., 2006

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The emotional exposure component of SIDI promotes immediate behavioral practice, replaces maladaptive coping with adaptive responses, and provides a sense of mastery.

    “This component of the treatment also has the added benefits of promoting immediate behavioral practice and the replacement of maladaptive coping behaviors with more adaptive responses, as well as providing a sense of mastery”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Otto et al., 2005 source
    • cites Otto et al., 2004 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    SIDI seems to be a short and practical treatment for inpatient substance use settings.

    “SIDI appears to be a brief and feasible intervention for use within inpatient substance use facilities”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Brown et al. treatment was developed for nicotine-dependent individuals, so its applicability to other substance dependent populations is unclear.

    “given that this treatment was developed specifically for nicotine-dependent individuals only, its applicability to and utility for other (arguably more severe) substance dependent populations is unclear”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brown et al. (2008) source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Participants were randomized into three conditions: SIDI, SC, and TAU.

    “Next, participants were randomized into three conditions: SIDI (n = 28), SC (n = 24), or TAU (n = 24)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    SIDI draws on skills from DBT and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, both of which have been shown to reduce substance use and other maladaptive behaviors.

    “SIDI draws on skills from DBT (Linehan, 1993; Linehan et al., 2002; Linehan et al., 1999) and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (Hayes et al., 1999) – both of which have been shown to reduce substance use and other maladaptive behaviors”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Linehan, 1993 source
    • cites Hayes et al., 1999

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The MTPT and PASAT have been shown to reliably induce emotional distress and are significantly intercorrelated.

    “the MTPT and the PASAT have been shown to reliably induce emotional distress among clinical and nonclinical samples (Bornovalova et al., 2008; Gratz et al., 2007; Gratz et al., 2010; Lejuez et al., 2003) and to be significantly intercorrelated”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bornovalova et al., 2008 source
    • cites Gratz et al., 2007 source
    • cites Lejuez et al., 2003

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Pre- and post-task negative affect were assessed to ensure the tasks measure distress tolerance rather than absolute distress.

    “To ensure that the tasks measure distress tolerance rather than absolute distress, levels of anxiety, frustration, irritability, and discomfort (on a scale from 0 [none] to 100 [extreme]) are assessed pre- and post-task”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Both comparison conditions were inactive and lacked empirically supported components.

    “neither comparison condition was active or included empirically-supported elements.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    All sessions were audiotaped, and supervision was held weekly by a Ph.D.-level clinician involved in protocol development.

    “All sessions were audiotaped, and supervision was held weekly by a Ph.D.-level clinician involved in the development of the protocol (KLG).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    An independent rater evaluated about 30% of treatment recordings for therapist adherence and competence.

    “Approximately 30% of treatment tapes were rated by an independent rater to assess therapist adherence and competence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The SC condition unexpectedly resulted in a decrease in distress tolerance, which may have inflated the positive effects of the active treatment.

    “the SC condition unexpectedly resulted in a decrease in distress tolerance (potentially inflating the positive effects of our active treatment).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The reliable change index (RCI) was used to index clinically significant change in distress tolerance.

    “we examined if the changes in distress tolerance were clinically significant (as indexed by the reliable change index (RCI; Jacobson and Truax, 1991)).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jacobson and Truax, 1991 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The use of a unique underserved sample of urban, primarily minority SUD patients makes replication across a variety of SUD populations a priority.

    “our use of a rather unique underserved sample of urban, primarily minority, SUD patients makes replication across a variety of SUD populations a priority.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The study employed behavioral measures of distress tolerance instead of self-report, avoiding biases from social desirability or insight.

    “we used behavioral (rather than self-report) measures of distress tolerance, which are not subject to reporting biases related to social desirability or insight.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    SIDI targets distress tolerance directly and effectively.

    “findings that SIDI targets distress tolerance directly (and effectively)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    SC deliberately excluded acceptance-based and exposure techniques.

    “SC specifically avoided acceptance-based or exposure techniques.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The sample size was relatively small, which limits the generalizability and statistical conclusion validity of the findings.

    “the sample size was relatively small. Although the emergence of significant results despite the small sample size supports the strength of the treatment effects, the small sample size limits the generalizability and statistical conclusion validity of our findings”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Controlling for changes in CES-D scores over treatment ensures that observed changes in distress tolerance are not simply the result of changes in that dimension of negative affect.

    “controlling for changes in CES-D scores over the course of the treatment ensures that any observed changes in distress tolerance are not simply the result of changes in this dimension of negative affect in general.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The CES-D is a valid measure of negative affect (or depressive symptoms).
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Non-specific treatment factors and the simple provision of support have clinical utility for depression.

    “consistent with research suggesting the clinical utility of non-specific treatment factors and the simple provision of support; see Horvath and Symonds, 1991; Klein et al., 2003”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Horvath and Symonds, 1991 source
    • cites Klein et al., 2003 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    SIDI and SC were delivered by trained therapists with master's degrees.

    “Trained, masters-level therapists administered SIDI and SC.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    SC was administered to control for non-specific elements of therapist contact, including time, therapeutic alliance, and treatment expectancy.

    “SC was administered to control for the non-specific elements of therapist contact (time, therapeutic alliance, treatment expectancy).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    For both SIDI and SC, specific therapist behaviors were considered prescribed and proscribed to assure that the treatments delivered were distinct.

    “For both SIDI and SC, specific therapist behaviors were considered “prescribed” and “proscribed” (Waltz et al., 1993) to assure that the treatment delivered in each was distinct.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Waltz et al., 1993 source
44 of 44
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Remaining withdrawal symptoms are minimal and do not affect distress tolerance task performance.

    “To limit the potential influence of any remaining withdrawal symptoms on performance (expected to be minimal given the requirement of detoxification prior to entering this treatment facility), participants were recruited into the study between 2–5 days from residential treatment entry”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The CES-D is a valid measure of negative affect (or depressive symptoms).

    “changes in CES-D scores”
    “a measure of one dimension of negative affect”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Improvements in clinical outcome and distress tolerance occur when targeted by treatments designed to improve distress tolerance skills.

    “improvements in clinical outcome and distress tolerance occur when targeted by treatments designed to improve distress tolerance skills”

    From United we stand: emphasizing commonalities across cognitive-behavioral therapies. (2013) · cites this paper as Bornovalova et al., 2012

    Section 3.3 reports that patients receiving the distress-tolerance intervention SIDI improved in both distress tolerance and depressive symptoms. But depressive-symptom improvement was comparable across groups, and the Discussion (Section 4) says the study did not examine longer-term clinical outcomes such as relapse. The claim is therefore broader than the demonstrated effect of this intervention in residential substance-use treatment. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interventions targeting distress tolerance have shown potential in reducing depressive symptoms.

    “Interventions targeting DT have shown potential in reducing depressive symptoms (Bornovalova et al., 2012)”

    From Distress tolerance as a mediator of mindfulness-based intervention for anxiety and depression: Evidence from two randomized controlled trials (2024) · cites this paper as Bornovalova et al., 2012

    The Results (§3.3, Efficacy) report significant pre-to-post reductions in depressive symptoms among patients receiving the distress-tolerance intervention. But depressive-symptom improvement did not differ significantly between groups; the Discussion (§4) says improvements across groups were likely due to treatment as usual. The paper therefore does not establish that targeting distress tolerance produced the reductions. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Distress tolerance is amenable to cognitive-behavioral interventions.

    “Importantly, distress tolerance is amenable to cognitive-behavioral interventions (Bornovalova et al., 2012; Linehan, 2015).”
  • Dialectical Behavior Therapy and Skills for Improving Distress Intolerance have been shown to improve distress tolerance.

    “Various intervention formats, such as Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT; Becker & Zayfert, 2001; Linehan, 2015) and Skills for Improving Distress Intolerance (SIDI; Bornovalova et al., 2012), have each been shown to improve distress tolerance.”

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Consistentχ²(4) = 16.39reported p < .01 · recomputed p = .003

    “χ2(4) = 16.39, p < .01”

  • Consistentχ²(2) = 11.64reported p < .01 · recomputed p = .003

    “χ2(2) = 11.64, p < .01”

2 of 2

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Lejuez, 2003, A modified computer version of the paced auditory serial addition task (PASAT) as a laboratory-based stressor, J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry, 26, 290
  2. O’Brien, 1990, Integrating systematic cue exposure with standard treatment in recovering drug dependent patients, Addict. Behav., 15, 355, 10.1016/0306-4603(90)90045-Y · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bornovalova, M. A., Gratz, K. L., Daughters, S. B., Hunt, E. D., & Lejuez, C. W.
Affiliations
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Bornovalova, Marina A.
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-04
Volume
122
Issue
1-2
Pages
70-76
ISSN
0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004223117
Cited by
210
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (P30DA028807, R36DA021820)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
distress tolerance, substance use disorders, residential addiction treatment, brief psychological intervention, adjunctive therapy, relapse prevention, treatment discontinuation, depressive symptoms, therapeutic relationship, treatment expectancy, credibility, inpatient care
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Behavior Therapy, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Residential Treatment, Stress, Psychological, Treatment Outcome, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review